2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.82.092004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fermi LAT observations of cosmic-ray electrons from 7 GeV to 1 TeV

Abstract: We present the results of our analysis of cosmic-ray electrons using about 8 × 10 6 electron candidates detected in the first 12 months on-orbit by the Fermi Large Area Telescope. This work extends our previously published cosmic-ray electron spectrum down to 7 GeV, giving a spectral range of approximately 2.5 decades up to 1 TeV. We describe in detail the analysis and its validation using beam-test and on-orbit data. In addition, we describe the spectrum measured via a subset of events selected for the best e… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

18
289
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 320 publications
(309 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
18
289
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Electrons and positrons are a good calibration source because they interact in the LAT CAL in the same way that photons do: they both produce electromagnetic showers. The energy measurement bias coming from the slight differences between CRE and photons interactions in the LAT is much less than 1% [4]. The capabilities of the LAT to measure the CRE spectrum have been well demonstrated [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Electrons and positrons are a good calibration source because they interact in the LAT CAL in the same way that photons do: they both produce electromagnetic showers. The energy measurement bias coming from the slight differences between CRE and photons interactions in the LAT is much less than 1% [4]. The capabilities of the LAT to measure the CRE spectrum have been well demonstrated [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The energy resolution for all three available energy reconstruction methods was measured to be consistent with expectations. However despite these improvements, the reconstructed energy in the CU was consistently higher than the beam energy by ∼9%, on average, with further fluctuations of ∼5%, depending on incoming beam energy (5-282 GeV), angle (0-60 degrees) and position of the crystal within the shower [4,11].…”
Section: Lat Energy Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations