2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2007.08.138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fermi level dependence of Mössbauer spectroscopic components corresponding to iron interstitials and their clusters in silicon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…42 Extensive measurements in n-and p-type samples, where 57 Fe was introduced by several methods, were also carried out by Yoshida and his group. 13,26,43 Although their data for p-type Si seems to be in line with other reported data (δ = 0.8 mm/s), for n-type material a resonance at δ = 0.40 mm/s has been assigned to Fe 0 i . Since our calculations conflict with this assignment, we investigated several possible sources of error, including (i) increasing the BZ sampling grid to MP-4 3 , (ii) bringing the 3s state of Fe into the valence to be treated within the Kohn-Sham scheme, (iii) including an on-site correction to the exchange-correlation energy by means of the GGA+U +J approach as proposed by Liechtenstein et al 113 (with Hubbard and Hund parameters in the range U = 2-5 eV and J = 0-1 eV), and (iv) using the local density approximation to the electronic exchange-correlation interactions.…”
Section: B Interstitial Iron In Siliconsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…42 Extensive measurements in n-and p-type samples, where 57 Fe was introduced by several methods, were also carried out by Yoshida and his group. 13,26,43 Although their data for p-type Si seems to be in line with other reported data (δ = 0.8 mm/s), for n-type material a resonance at δ = 0.40 mm/s has been assigned to Fe 0 i . Since our calculations conflict with this assignment, we investigated several possible sources of error, including (i) increasing the BZ sampling grid to MP-4 3 , (ii) bringing the 3s state of Fe into the valence to be treated within the Kohn-Sham scheme, (iii) including an on-site correction to the exchange-correlation energy by means of the GGA+U +J approach as proposed by Liechtenstein et al 113 (with Hubbard and Hund parameters in the range U = 2-5 eV and J = 0-1 eV), and (iv) using the local density approximation to the electronic exchange-correlation interactions.…”
Section: B Interstitial Iron In Siliconsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The ISOLDE consortium reported a δ(Fe s ) = −0.04 mm/s peak which is effectively independent of the dopant type and concentration, and was therefore assigned to the neutral charge state of substitutional iron (Fe 0 s ). From the same experiments, neutral and positively charged Fe i defects were assigned to resonances at δ(Fe 0 i ) = 0.72 mm/s and δ(Fe + i ) = 0.78 mm/s in n-type and p- 26,43 Other defects were tentatively assigned using MS, namely a quadrupole-split doublet labeled Fe N with ∆(Fe N ) = 0.51 mm/s and δ(Fe N ) =0.43 mm/s, assigned to an iron-vacancy (Fe i V) pair, 12 and another doublet labeled Fe D which has been associated to Fe in regions damaged by the ion-implantation process, with ∆(Fe D ) = 1.02 mm/s and δ(Fe D ) =0.33 mm/s. 33 Ab-initio calculations of Mössbauer parameters have played an important role in the interpretation and validation of experimental data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rather low statistics of the spectra is mainly due to the extremely low concentration of 57 Fe, which is the only way to provide a solid solution of 57 Fe in Si without forming Fe-silicides. This has been confirmed in a series of earlier experiments from our group on 57 Fe doped Si after annealing at 1,273 K for 1 week [6,7]. It can be clearly seen, however, in Fig.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Their isomer shifts do not change at all within experimental errors during all measurements. The isomer shifts of the singlet 1, 2 and 3 are −0.12 (3) mm/s, 0.33 (3) mm/s, 0.67 (8) mm/s, respectively, which are in good agreement with those of substitutional Fe s , interstitial Fe 0 i and Fe + i [4][5][6][7]. The third component of Fe + i appears to be too small to discuss precisely in the present experiment, although this component could be more clearly detected before in a simple absorber experiment on the same type of sample.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation