2000
DOI: 10.1143/jpsj.69.1105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fermi Surface Properties of USi3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fermi surface of UGe 3 and USi 3 were well explained under the assumption that 5 f electrons in the U atom are itinerant. 4,5) UAl 3 crystallizes in the AuCu 3 -type crystal structure, in which the U nuclei form a simple cubic sublattice and the Al nuclei occupy each face center of the simple cubic unit cell. The space group is identical to that of the U sublattice, * E-mail address: giappoliano@phys.u-ryukyu.ac.jp i.e., Pm3m.…”
Section: Methods Of Band Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fermi surface of UGe 3 and USi 3 were well explained under the assumption that 5 f electrons in the U atom are itinerant. 4,5) UAl 3 crystallizes in the AuCu 3 -type crystal structure, in which the U nuclei form a simple cubic sublattice and the Al nuclei occupy each face center of the simple cubic unit cell. The space group is identical to that of the U sublattice, * E-mail address: giappoliano@phys.u-ryukyu.ac.jp i.e., Pm3m.…”
Section: Methods Of Band Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, another possibility to obtain a metallic state is considered here. The Fermi surfaces of USi 3 has been investigated and well explained by using a similar method [5]. Only the discrepancy is the size of the closed µ Fermi surface centered at the M points, which consists of 6d electrons of uranium.…”
Section: Band Structure and Fermi Surfaces Of Thtementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This discrepancy prevents us to get a good starting point to understand the interesting phenomena regarding with UTe 2 . As for nonmagnetic uranium compounds, the Fermi surfaces have been investigated, for examples, UB 12 [3], UPt 3 [4], USi 3 [5], U 3 Ni 3 Sn 4 [6], and UPt 5 [7]. The agreement of the de Haas-van Alphen frequencies between the experiments and theoretical predictions are quite well, but still some discrepancies in the magnitudes are left.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When considering the UX 3 (X = pmetal) materials, the size of the p-atom is a very important parameter. In the case of smaller X -ions (Si, Ge) [2], the p-wave function decays slower at the U-site, resulting in strong 5f -p hybridization which leads to lack of magnetic ordering (UGe 3 , USi 3 ) [4,2,3] while larger X -ions (In, Pb) cause the hybridization to be weaker resulting in magnetic ground state (UIn 3 , UPb 3 ) [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%