2014
DOI: 10.5575/geosoc.2014.0038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ferric oxyhydroxide in underground geological environments and high-level radioactive waste disposal: Analysis of influence on nuclide migration scenarios

Abstract: Ferric oxyhydroxide in subsurface geological environments may influence the long-term natural barrier function with respect to nuclide migration at potential sites of disposal of high-level radioactive wastes (HLW). Here, samples of ferric oxyhydroxide from the subsurface environment of Japan were studied in order to ( ) evaluate suitable repository depths that will need to be characterized; and ( ) assess how ferric oxyhydroxide will need to be treated with respect to nuclide migration at a future repository … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this study, we selected four types of solutions to simulate geological disposal: Ca(OH) 2 solution (pH = 12.8) and KOH solution (pH = 13.0), based on the assumption that highly alkaline pore water is generated through the reaction of cement-based material with groundwater; FeCl 2 solution (pH = 4.9), based on the assumption that ferric iron (Fe 3+ ) is generated by the reaction between oxygen, which is carried from the ground by excavations performed in facility construction, and iron, which is in the steel support and bedrock; and MgCl 2 solution (pH 7.5), based on the assumption that metal ions are present in seawater groundwater in coastal areas. The reason for using an FeCl 2 solution despite an assumption based on ferric iron (Fe 3+ ) is as follows: According to a previous study 18) that examined the effect of iron hydroxide in a groundwater scenario in geological disposal, iron ions dissolved in groundwater as ferrous iron may be oxidized to form ferric iron after moving through cracks in the bedrock. Furthermore, the solubility of iron hydroxide (Fe(OH) 3 ) in water is extremely low.…”
Section: Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this study, we selected four types of solutions to simulate geological disposal: Ca(OH) 2 solution (pH = 12.8) and KOH solution (pH = 13.0), based on the assumption that highly alkaline pore water is generated through the reaction of cement-based material with groundwater; FeCl 2 solution (pH = 4.9), based on the assumption that ferric iron (Fe 3+ ) is generated by the reaction between oxygen, which is carried from the ground by excavations performed in facility construction, and iron, which is in the steel support and bedrock; and MgCl 2 solution (pH 7.5), based on the assumption that metal ions are present in seawater groundwater in coastal areas. The reason for using an FeCl 2 solution despite an assumption based on ferric iron (Fe 3+ ) is as follows: According to a previous study 18) that examined the effect of iron hydroxide in a groundwater scenario in geological disposal, iron ions dissolved in groundwater as ferrous iron may be oxidized to form ferric iron after moving through cracks in the bedrock. Furthermore, the solubility of iron hydroxide (Fe(OH) 3 ) in water is extremely low.…”
Section: Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, geochemical data and their statistical analyses are effective for estimating the behavior, distribution, and sources of materials regarding geological events, such as fault activities in Japan (Yoshida and Yamamoto, 2014;Niwa et al, 2015Niwa et al, , 2019. Although data accumulation is required for further research to evaluate faults and other event deposits, simple and rapid analyses using portable XRF are limited (Solum et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%