2002
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.66.132401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ferromagnetic resonance in periodic particle arrays

Abstract: We report measurements of the ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) spectra of arrays of submicron size periodic particle arrays of permalloy produced by electron-beam lithography. In contrast to plane ferromagnetic films, the spectra of the arrays show a number of additional resonance peaks, whose position depends strongly on the orientation of the external magnetic field and the interparticle interaction. Time-dependent micromagnetic simulation of the ac response show that these peaks are associated with coupled exc… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
99
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23, M s can be reliably determined via measurement of the quasiuniform mode frequency versus external field applied parallel to the wire axis. From these measurements we determined the saturation magnetization M s of each wire: 790 ± 1 emu/cm 3 (wire A), 785 ± 1 emu/cm 3 (wire B), 850 ± 3 emu/cm 3 (wire C), which are typical for Py thin films [59][60][61][62][63] . These values of M s together with a g-factor of 2.1 63,64 and an exchange stiffness of 1.3 µerg/cm 59,61 are used as material parameters for our analytical calculations and micromagnetic simulations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23, M s can be reliably determined via measurement of the quasiuniform mode frequency versus external field applied parallel to the wire axis. From these measurements we determined the saturation magnetization M s of each wire: 790 ± 1 emu/cm 3 (wire A), 785 ± 1 emu/cm 3 (wire B), 850 ± 3 emu/cm 3 (wire C), which are typical for Py thin films [59][60][61][62][63] . These values of M s together with a g-factor of 2.1 63,64 and an exchange stiffness of 1.3 µerg/cm 59,61 are used as material parameters for our analytical calculations and micromagnetic simulations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetization dynamics have been studied in such elements by various techniques. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] Substantial effort has been made to study magnetization reversal in continuous films and small elements 8,9 but the coherence 10,11 of precessional switching and the origin of the damping 12,13 are the subject of continuing debate. Time-resolved magnetic images 14 show that precessional switching is incoherent even in a permalloy element that initially has uniform magnetization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By virtue of their extremely small size, these nanometer scale structures possess unique properties that differ from their parent bulk material͑s͒, [1][2][3][4] which make them potential candidates for various advanced magnetoelectronic devices. [5][6][7][8] Further device development may well depend on a better understanding of various dynamic magnetic phenomena in such nanostructures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%