1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf00227023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fertile, intermediate hybrids between Phaseolus vulgaris and P. acutifolius from congruity backcrossing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we do not know the biochemical basis for the difference in mitochondrial heat tolerance, if it is maternally inherited, then P. acutifolius must be used as the female parent when generating interspecific hybrids. However, in most attempts to generate interspecific hybrids, P. vulgaris is used as the maternal parent because of increased fertility and greater success at embryo rescue (6).…”
Section: Implications For Bean Breedingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we do not know the biochemical basis for the difference in mitochondrial heat tolerance, if it is maternally inherited, then P. acutifolius must be used as the female parent when generating interspecific hybrids. However, in most attempts to generate interspecific hybrids, P. vulgaris is used as the maternal parent because of increased fertility and greater success at embryo rescue (6).…”
Section: Implications For Bean Breedingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recurrent backcrossing has only infrequently been capable of such a task; frequent problems are the loss of the important trait(s) from the nonrecurrent parent, diffi culties in transferring traits that are quantitatively inherited, chromosome or genome elimination, and large linkage groups that are diffi cult to break. Haghighi and Ascher ( 1988 ) were the fi rst to report the use of congruity backcrossing as a useful means to create an interspecifi c hybrid between P. vulgaris and P. acutifolius. In this crossing scheme, the hybrids are backcrossed with each of the parent species in alternate generations.…”
Section: Congruity Backcrossingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several attempts were made (Alvarez et aI., 1981;AI-Yasiri & Coyne, 1964;Andrade-Aguilar & Jackson, 1988;Honma, 1956;Jung et aI., 1992;Mok et aI., 1978;Smartt, 1970;Thomas & Waines, 1980, 1984, but success was limited , and embryo rescue was required to recover hybrid progenies. More recently, with the careful choice of donor parents (Federici & Waines, 1989;Nelson & Ascher, 1984;Parker & Michaels, 1986;Thomas & Waines, 1984) and the application of the congruity backcross scheme (Brown et aI., 1996;Haghighi & Ascher, 1988;Mejia-Jimenez et aI., 1994), a second series of crosses was attempted with greater success. Given the need for embryo rescue techniques and the complete sterility of F I hybrids, it seems reasonable to consider tepary as belonging to the tertiary gene pool of common bean, a conclusion reached by many authors (Andrade-Aguilar & Jackson, 1988;Prendota et aI., 1982;Pueyo & Delgado Salinas, 1997;Smartt, 1970) .…”
Section: The Tertiary Gene Poolmentioning
confidence: 98%