2021
DOI: 10.1002/jso.26387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fertility after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: A call to action

Abstract: Introduction Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is increasingly accepted as the best therapeutic option in primary and some secondary peritoneal malignancies. The ramifications of this procedure on fertility are unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the current association of CRS/HIPEC with fertility following surgery. Methods A review of patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC between 2009 and 2018 was performed. Female patients were included if they were betwee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings showed that PMP recurrence rates rose rapidly two years post-CRS, implying that women who underwent CRS with/without HIPEC for PMP with ovarian preservation should attempt to conceive as soon as possible when the recommended waiting period following therapy is complete (12,13). In other literature, two small retrospective studies and 5 case reports have investigated the feasibility of ovarian preservation in patients with PMP of appendiceal origin (14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). One study in four women aged 28-35 years with PMP who sought to maintain fertility adopted a strategy that involved laparoscopy for disease staging followed by appendicectomy, irrigation of the abdominal and pelvic cavity with water, and stripping of macroscopic disease from the peritoneal surface of the pelvis and the surface of the ovaries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Our findings showed that PMP recurrence rates rose rapidly two years post-CRS, implying that women who underwent CRS with/without HIPEC for PMP with ovarian preservation should attempt to conceive as soon as possible when the recommended waiting period following therapy is complete (12,13). In other literature, two small retrospective studies and 5 case reports have investigated the feasibility of ovarian preservation in patients with PMP of appendiceal origin (14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). One study in four women aged 28-35 years with PMP who sought to maintain fertility adopted a strategy that involved laparoscopy for disease staging followed by appendicectomy, irrigation of the abdominal and pelvic cavity with water, and stripping of macroscopic disease from the peritoneal surface of the pelvis and the surface of the ovaries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Unlike in our case, few patients after cytoreductive surgery retain child-bearing potential due to the high rate of hysterectomy and oophorectomy at time of surgery [17]. Efforts towards enhanced preoperative counselling for cryopreservation, increased oocyte and embryo cryopreservation, and assessing the safety of conserving reproductive organs at the time of surgery are desirable [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…35 Unfortunately, limited data have been conducted concerning number of female patients undergoing fertility preservation methods after cytoreduction in combination with HIPEC. 36 Thus, the need for an extended preoperative guidance concerning fertility options such as oocyte cryopreservation remains mandatory. 37…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%