2016
DOI: 10.9745/ghsp-d-16-00044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fertility Awareness Methods Are Not Modern Contraceptives: Defining Contraception to Reflect Our Priorities

Abstract: A recent article in GHSP calls for classifying fertility awareness methods as “modern contraceptives” despite their inferiority. We believe in a rights-based approach, which considers the real-world conditions that many women face, including constrained sexual agency and low baseline reproductive health literacy. We must demonstrate true commitment to increasing access to the most effective and reliable contraceptive methods.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the finding is expected considering evidence that majority of AGYW in SSA do not use modern contraceptives but rather traditional contraceptives for various reasons including stigma and discrimination by healthcare providers and fear of side effects [ 30 32 ]. Several studies have also argued that compared to modern methods of contraception, traditional contraceptives are not effective in preventing pregnancy [ 31 , 56 , 57 ]. There is the need for further studies on the trend and extent to which the use of traditional methods of contraception contribute to unintended pregnancy among AGYW in high fertility countries in SSA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the finding is expected considering evidence that majority of AGYW in SSA do not use modern contraceptives but rather traditional contraceptives for various reasons including stigma and discrimination by healthcare providers and fear of side effects [ 30 32 ]. Several studies have also argued that compared to modern methods of contraception, traditional contraceptives are not effective in preventing pregnancy [ 31 , 56 , 57 ]. There is the need for further studies on the trend and extent to which the use of traditional methods of contraception contribute to unintended pregnancy among AGYW in high fertility countries in SSA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, self-reporting of traditional contraceptive use might reflect residual confounders such as maternal autonomy, which was not incorporated in this analysis but has been associated with stunting in other settings 42. In addition, we used DHS-aligned definitions of contraceptive type (modern or traditional), but the distinction between modern versus traditional methods has been debated 43. We justify the definitions used in this study as appropriate given that it is the classification scheme currently recommended by DHS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are often classified as modernalthough these classifications are not universal (e.g., the United Nations Population Division does not classify these methods as modern)-and the nomenclature is imperfect. [17][18][19][20][21] In addition to FABMs, some people use menstrual tracking smartphone apps or devices to time sexual intercourse for pregnancy prevention. Although 2 apps have received clearance from the United States Food and Drug Administration for use as a contraceptive method (Natural Cycles in 2018, 22 which also received CE Marking in Europe, and Clue in 2021 23 ), most such apps or devices are not tested or indicated for this purpose and may offer predictions of unknown accuracy regarding the timing of fertile days.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%