2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.09.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fertility outcomes after laparoscopic salpingectomy or salpingotomy for tubal ectopic pregnancy: A retrospective cohort study of 95 patients

Abstract: Surgical management options for EP should be comprehensively evaluated in the clinical setting as numerous factors influence the decision making process. This paper provides a foundation for further studies upon which reliable surgical treatment guidelines for patients with tubal EP can be established.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…About surgery, we did not find any significant difference in reproductive outcomes between the different surgical techniques (salpingectomy, salpingostomy and tubal milking), according to some previous studies [ 7 , 30 ]. Nevertheless, our results are limited by the high proportion of patients underwent salpingectomy (94.1%), which limits the cases managed with other approaches and the related study power to show a difference.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…About surgery, we did not find any significant difference in reproductive outcomes between the different surgical techniques (salpingectomy, salpingostomy and tubal milking), according to some previous studies [ 7 , 30 ]. Nevertheless, our results are limited by the high proportion of patients underwent salpingectomy (94.1%), which limits the cases managed with other approaches and the related study power to show a difference.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Nevertheless, our results are limited by the high proportion of patients underwent salpingectomy (94.1%), which limits the cases managed with other approaches and the related study power to show a difference. The high proportion of patients managed by salpingectomy was because it is the treatment of choice at our Institution; indeed, other studies clearly reported a lower rate of recurrence with no significant difference in future fertility after salpingectomy as compared to salpingotomy [ 7 , 18 , 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In some rare or complex cases, bilateral salpingectomy should be considered. In addition, Chen et al [19] and Cheng et al [20] showed that there is no statistical difference in long-term reproductive outcomes between the two surgical options. After surgical treatment of the tube, a serum ß-HCG based control is necessary.…”
Section: Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%