2019
DOI: 10.1177/1179558119870163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fertility Preservation Using GnRH Agonists: Rationale, Possible Mechanisms, and Explanation of Controversy

Abstract: The only clinically accepted method of fertility preservation in young women facing gonadotoxic chemo- and/or radiotherapy for malignant or autoimmune diseases is cryopreservation of embryos or unfertilized ova, whereas cryopreservation of ovarian tissue for future reimplantation, or in vitro maturation of follicles, and the use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) are still considered investigational, by several authorities. Whereas previous publications have raised the fear of GnRHa’s possible … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 142 publications
(826 reference statements)
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 65 - 71 One of the main reasons for this controversy is represented by the lack of proper data demonstrating the mechanism behind the protective effect of this strategy. 72 - 75 Nevertheless, clinical data for patients with breast cancer have recently solved the controversy and this option is now considered a standard strategy for ovarian function preservation in this setting. 16 , 18 , 76 - 78 However, this is not an alternative to cryopreservation options as a strategy for fertility preservation considering the more limited evidence regarding the number of pregnancies obtained by patients who received this strategy.…”
Section: Burning Questions During the Oncofertility Counseling Of Youmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 65 - 71 One of the main reasons for this controversy is represented by the lack of proper data demonstrating the mechanism behind the protective effect of this strategy. 72 - 75 Nevertheless, clinical data for patients with breast cancer have recently solved the controversy and this option is now considered a standard strategy for ovarian function preservation in this setting. 16 , 18 , 76 - 78 However, this is not an alternative to cryopreservation options as a strategy for fertility preservation considering the more limited evidence regarding the number of pregnancies obtained by patients who received this strategy.…”
Section: Burning Questions During the Oncofertility Counseling Of Youmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, the biological rationale behind its protective effect remains to be defined. [98][99][100][101] Nevertheless, after many years of debate on the efficacy and safety of this approach, [102][103][104][105][106] recent clinical data have led current guidelines to recommend its use as a strategy to preserve ovarian function during chemotherapy, mainly in the case of young women with breast cancer. 13 14 107-110 Most of the evidence available on the efficacy and safety of this strategy exists for premenopausal patients with breast cancer.…”
Section: Lhrha During Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…161 Large, prospective, randomized controlled trials are still needed to determine the protective effect of GnRHas in hematologic malignancies and HCT and utilization of GnRHas for fertility preservation should be reserved for investigational use only. 162 Vaginal changes in HCT survivors are most often a result of cGVHD; patients may complain of non-specific symptoms, such as vaginal pain, burning, dysuria, a feeling of redness and swelling, perineal and perianal soreness, dryness, and dyspareunia. Of note, patients who are sexually active may feel these symptoms earlier in their post-HCT course.…”
Section: Female Survivorsmentioning
confidence: 99%