2021
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.11436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fertilization time of slow‐release fertilizer affects the physicochemical properties of starch from spring‐sown waxy maize

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Slow-release fertilizer is widely used in cereal crop production because it is ecofriendly and laborsaving. Effects of different application stages (zero-, three-, and six-leaf stages, denoted as SN0, SN3, and SN6, respectively) of slow-release (N/P 2 O 5 /K 2 O = 225/75/75 kg ha −1 ) fertilizer on physicochemical properties of starch from spring-sown waxy maize were investigated in 2018 and 2019. Application of traditional fertilizer (NCK, compound fertilizer; N/P 2 O 5 /K 2 O = 75/75/75 kg ha −1 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another study has reported that ACL is unaffected by N fertilization [ 43 ], and that the ACL gradually increased with the increase of N rate at the panicle stage [ 44 ]. In waxy maize, the ACL was unaffected by CF but its response to SF was different between the two years [ 30 ]. A study on rice has reported that the ACL’s response to N rates is dependent on cultivars, and that the change is consistent to the relative expression level of soluble starch synthase I and branching enzymes IIb [ 12 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another study has reported that ACL is unaffected by N fertilization [ 43 ], and that the ACL gradually increased with the increase of N rate at the panicle stage [ 44 ]. In waxy maize, the ACL was unaffected by CF but its response to SF was different between the two years [ 30 ]. A study on rice has reported that the ACL’s response to N rates is dependent on cultivars, and that the change is consistent to the relative expression level of soluble starch synthase I and branching enzymes IIb [ 12 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past decade, studies on rice [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ] and wheat [ 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ] have reported that the application of SF affects the grain quality by changing the concentrations of protein, starch, oil and mineral elements. However, studies have mainly focused on the grain quality while starch structural and functional properties have received less attention [ 30 , 31 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, compared with treatments using high-level nitrogen fertilizers, moderate nitrogen fertilizers significantly increased peak viscosity and final viscosity of starch in common buckwheat [ 58 ]. In waxy maize, the peak viscosity, final viscosity and setback viscosity of starch in grain increased gradually with the delayed application of slow-release fertilizer, where a one-time application of slow-release fertilizer at six leaf stages significantly increased peak viscosity, final viscosity and setback viscosity of grain starch, which made the grain taste waxier and softer [ 28 ]. In our study, delayed application of SCU and RCU significantly increased peak viscosity, final viscosity and setback viscosity of lotus rhizome starch, which were significantly reduced under SCU1 and RCU1 treatments ( Table 3 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In maize, slow-release fertilizer could significantly increase SPAD, grain nitrogen content and maize yield [ 27 ]. After delayed treatment of slow-release fertilizer (six-leaf stage treatment), the starch content and the number of large starch granules of waxy maize were significantly increased and the starch pasting properties was significantly improved [ 28 ]. These results indicate that changing fertilizer application times is a strategy for pursuing high-yield, high-quality crops.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starch formation is closely linked to the activities of critical enzymes such as sucrose synthase (SuSy), ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (AGPase), granule-bound starch synthase (GBSS), soluble starch synthase (SSS), and starch branching enzyme (SBE) [21,22]. Previous studies have shown that appropriate cultural practices such as slow-release fertilizer application, increased nitrogen supply, and chemical control can stimulate starch formation by increasing the activities of these enzymes, thereby improving maize grain filling [23,24]. It can be seen that variations in the activities of these critical enzymes for starch synthesis can regulate grain filling by affecting starch formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%