2023
DOI: 10.1097/gco.0000000000000856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fetal growth disorders in twin gestations

Abstract: Purpose of reviewTwin gestations account for approximately 3% of all births. Although there appear to be physiologic differences in the third trimester growth of twins compared with singleton gestations, reasons for this remain unclear. As growth-restricted fetuses and neonates are at increased risk for adverse outcomes, there is a clinical need to optimize our ability to delineate normally from pathologically grown twins.Recent findingsRecent studies have addressed current limitations in the way growth restri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is a growing body of evidence that twin-specific standards are well tolerated, have similar ability to identify foetuses at risk of stillbirth and are less likely to classify foetuses as growth-restricted, therefore, reducing the frequency of additional scans, hospital visits and maternal stress (Fig. 1) [61]. This also translates into lower rates of unnecessary antenatal steroid administration, iatrogenic preterm deliveries and neonatal unit admissions.…”
Section: Evidence Supporting the Use Of Twin-specific Growth Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is a growing body of evidence that twin-specific standards are well tolerated, have similar ability to identify foetuses at risk of stillbirth and are less likely to classify foetuses as growth-restricted, therefore, reducing the frequency of additional scans, hospital visits and maternal stress (Fig. 1) [61]. This also translates into lower rates of unnecessary antenatal steroid administration, iatrogenic preterm deliveries and neonatal unit admissions.…”
Section: Evidence Supporting the Use Of Twin-specific Growth Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea that twin-specific growth curves reduce the number of twins incorrectly classified as growth restricted was recently addressed by researchers from California and New York (Blumenfeld & Anderson, 2023). They begin by defining small-for-gestational age (SGA) and fetal growth restriction (FGR), terms that have been used interchangeably and, as such, inappropriately.…”
Section: Twin Research Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%