2014
DOI: 10.1159/000358058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fetal Growth Restriction at the Limits of Viability

Abstract: The outcome of early small-for-gestational age and/or intrauterine growth-restricted fetuses is reviewed. In these fetuses the outcome appears to be considerably poorer than that of appropriately grown fetuses and this seems mainly to be caused by intrauterine malnutrition rather than by hypoxemia. Active management of intrauterine growth restriction at the limits of viability may not be commenced before 26 weeks of gestation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Few data exist regarding periviable growth restricted babies, a category which is commonly associated with poor outcome [92]. In 2014 Story et al [102] reviewed the outcomes of 20 FGR fetuses diagnosed <24 weeks and EFW <3 rd centile reporting a 67% preterm delivery rate and a better than expected survival to neonatal discharge rate of 60%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Few data exist regarding periviable growth restricted babies, a category which is commonly associated with poor outcome [92]. In 2014 Story et al [102] reviewed the outcomes of 20 FGR fetuses diagnosed <24 weeks and EFW <3 rd centile reporting a 67% preterm delivery rate and a better than expected survival to neonatal discharge rate of 60%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A remarkable reduction in the gestational age cut off for neonatal survival has been achieved, and current neonatal practice has lead to the survival of fetuses born from 22 weeks onwards [90]. Recently published data report a better than expected prognosis for periviable small fetuses [91], however according to Visser et al [92] active intervention by delivery of early FGR fetuses should not be recommended before 26 weeks as their outcome is comparable to that of AGA infants born at a 2-weeks earlier gestational age. Counseling plays a crucial role, however in a scenario of lacking evidence it is usually individualized on the basis of the clinical features and the option of pregnancy termination may be discussed when legally available.…”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3, Table 2), and the outcome is comparable to that of appropriate for gestational age infants born at a 2-week shorter gestational age. 57 Accordingly, the threshold for delivery needs to be higher at earlier gestational age. The neurodevelopmental outcome of growth-restricted babies has received growing attention in recent years, given the impact on quality of life.…”
Section: Planning Delivery: Gestational Age As a Determinant Of Intermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fetal, developmental, or intrauterine growth restriction (FGR, DGR, or IUGR), also sometimes known as small for gestational age (SGA), is commonly defined as “a fetus that fails to reach its potential growth” during embryogenesis (Mandruzzato et al, ; Visser, Bilardo, & Lees, ). Close to 8% of human pregnancies develop FGR, making it a major clinical problem affecting the lives of numerous babies worldwide.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%