The cause of the increase in core temperature (CT) during hemodialysis (HD) is still under debate. It has been suggested that peripheral vasoconstriction as a result of hypovolemia, leading to a reduced dissipation of heat from the skin, is the main cause of this increase in CT. If so, then it would be expected that extracorporeal heat flow (Jex) needed to maintain a stable CT (isothermic; T-control ؍ 0, no change in CT) is largely different between body temperature control HD combined with ultrafiltration (UF) and body temperature control HD without UF (isovolemic). Consequently, significant differences in ⌬CT would be expected between isovolemic HD and HD combined with UF at zero Jex (thermoneutral; E-control ؍ 0, no supply or removal of thermal energy to and from the extracorporeal circulation). During the latter treatment, the CT is expected to increase. In this study, changes in thermal variables (CT and Jex), skin blood flow, energy expenditure, and cytokines (TNF-␣, IL-1 receptor antagonist, and IL-6) were compared in 13 patients, each undergoing body temperature control (T-control ؍ 0) HD without and with UF and energy-neutral (E-control ؍ 0) HD without and with UF. CT increased equally during energy-neutral treatments, with (0.32 ؎ 0.16°C; P ؍ 0.000) and without (0.27 ؎ 0.29°C; P ؍ 0.006) UF. In body temperature control treatments, the relationship between Jex and UF tended to be significant (r ؍ ؊0.51; P ؍ 0.07); however, there was no significant difference in cooling requirements regardless of whether treatments were done without (؊17.9 ؎ 9.3W) or with UF (؊17.8 ؎ 13.27W). Changes in energy expenditure did not differ among the four treatment modes. There were no significant differences in pre-and postdialysis levels of cytokines within or between treatments. Although fluid removal has an effect on thermal variables, no single mechanism seems to be responsible for the increased heat accumulation during HD. A n inadequate vascular response to hypovolemia is an important contributory factor to intradialytic hypotension. Although various mechanisms have been implicated in the pathogenesis of impaired vascular response during hemodialysis (HD) (1-7), there are strong indications that this phenomenon is often related to changes in body temperature and extracorporeal blood temperature (8 -22).We and others have observed that the core temperature (CT) increased during standard-temperature (37 to 38°C) dialysis (16,18 -24) even with net energy loss from the patient to the extracorporeal system. This phenomenon strongly suggests that the dialysis procedure itself leads to internal heat accumulation. It has been observed that 4 h of standard dialysis leads to a positive internal heat balance of approximately 300 kJ, which represents approximately 30% of the energy expenditure (EEvmax) of the patient (25). The internal heat accumulation might very well be responsible for the impaired vascular response during HD, as the thermoregulatory response (leading to dilation of thermoregulatory vessels) wi...