SummaryTheoretical models suggest that small differences only exist between brain and body temperature in health. Once the brain is injured, brain temperature is generally regarded to rise above body temperature. However, since reports of the magnitude of the temperature gradient between brain and body vary, it is still not clear whether conventional body temperature monitoring accurately predicts brain temperature at all times. In this prospective, descriptive study, 20 adults with severe primary brain trauma were studied during their stay in the neurointensive care unit. Brain temperature ranged from 33.4 to 39.9°C. Comparisons between paired brain and rectal temperature measurements revealed no evidence of a systematic difference [mean difference )0.04°C (range )0.13 to 0.05°C, 95% CI), p = 0.39]. Contrary to popular belief, brain temperature did not exceed systemic temperature in this relatively homogeneous patient series. The mean values masked inconsistent and unpredictable individual brain-rectal temperature differences (range 1.8 to )2.9°C) and reversal of the brain-body temperature gradient occurred in some patients. Brain temperature could not be predicted from body temperature at all times. Brain temperature is seldom measured during routine neurointensive care but there is a long-held assumption that since the temperatures of healthy internal organs differ only slightly [1], temperature measurements of the rectum, bladder, pulmonary artery and tympanum can be used as surrogates for brain temperature. Using these conventional body sites, temperatures greater than 38.5°C are commonly encountered during neurocritical care [2,3] and cause concern. In animal models of cerebral ischaemia [4][5][6][7] and trauma [8,9] a rise in body core temperature in excess of 38°C is associated with increased neuronal damage. In stroke patients a rise in body temperature independently predicts poor outcome [10] and increased mortality [11][12][13][14] but when the human brain is injured by trauma, the evidence for a relationship between raised body temperature and worse neurological outcome is not as clear [15,16]. However, it is assumed that the deleterious metabolic, inflammatory and biochemical mechanisms associated with raised body temperature in animal models of stroke and trauma may operate similarly in the brain injured human [17]. This assumption underpins current opinion that even a small increase in body temperature (1-2°C) above normal (37°C) accelerates ischaemic damage and increases the size of the primary brain lesion [9,18] and should therefore be prevented [13].Little is known about human brain temperature, but theoretical models suggest that during normothermia the temperature of the brain is close to that of internal carotid arterial blood before the blood enters the circle of Willis [19]. In man, direct measurement of brain temperature Anaesthesia, 2005, 60, pages 759-765