2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11912-021-01100-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FGFR Inhibitors: Clinical Activity and Development in the Treatment of Cholangiocarcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Basturk et al described four patients with this type of alteration, 55 which appeared to be enriched in ITPN compared with that in PDAC/IPMN. Since there is a growing body of evidence regarding the sensitivity of neoplastic cells harboring such fusions to FGFR inhibitors, 91,92 this alteration should be taken into account during the molecular diagnosis of ITPN and when developing tailored therapeutic approaches. A final consideration of the genetic landscape of pancreatic ITPN should be reserved for chromatin remodelers, such as MLL genes and BAP1, which seemed to be more altered in this type of lesion compared with that in conventional PDAC (although the comparison with existing datasets did not show statistical significance).…”
Section: O L E C U L a R L A N D S C A P Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basturk et al described four patients with this type of alteration, 55 which appeared to be enriched in ITPN compared with that in PDAC/IPMN. Since there is a growing body of evidence regarding the sensitivity of neoplastic cells harboring such fusions to FGFR inhibitors, 91,92 this alteration should be taken into account during the molecular diagnosis of ITPN and when developing tailored therapeutic approaches. A final consideration of the genetic landscape of pancreatic ITPN should be reserved for chromatin remodelers, such as MLL genes and BAP1, which seemed to be more altered in this type of lesion compared with that in conventional PDAC (although the comparison with existing datasets did not show statistical significance).…”
Section: O L E C U L a R L A N D S C A P Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…TST170 constitutes a hybrid capture-based assays, which captures targeted RNA molecules regardless of the neighbouring nucleotide sequence and is thus also able to detect unknown partner genes. These technical considerations have particular relevance for the evaluation of FGFR2 fusions, for which more than 150 partner genes have been reported in the literature until now [ 24 ]. In this study, AMP, OCAv3, and TST170 panels were applied in 78% ( n = 79/101), 21% ( n = 21/101), and 15% ( n = 15/101) of patients, respectively (Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other mechanisms of resistance include gatekeeper mutations, activation of alternate signaling pathways, polyclonal secondary FGFR mutations, cooccurring tumor suppressor gene alterations such as BAP1, CDKN2A/B, PBRM1, TP53 etc. [22][23][24] A number of FGFR2-point mutations (N549H, N549K, E565A, K641R, or K659M) and gatekeeper mutation (V565F and V565I) were seen in patients who developed progression on reversible ATP-competitive FGFR inhibitor. King et al and Goyal et al suggested combination therapy with mTOR/PI3K targeted therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitor, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor, chemotherapy or sequential FGFR targeted therapy as a possible direction towards overcoming resistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%