fib Bulletin 92.

Bisch, Philippe; Burns, Clare L.; Borosnyói, Adorján; Caldentey, Alejándro Pérez; Červenka, Vladimír; Debernardi, Pier Giorgio; Duarte, Noemí; Fehling, Ekkehard; Guiglia, Matteo; Bernat, Antonio Mari; Taliano, Maurizio; Torres, Lluís; Vráblík, Lukáš; Wan‐Wendner, Roman; Windisch, Andor

doi:10.35789/fib.bull.0092

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Effect Of Casting Position (Top Bar Effect)1

Orcid1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2020

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…poor conditions divided by the crack spacing measured in the face cast in good position increases as the bar diameter increases and decreases as the cover increases, as can be seen in Table 1. In the light of the above experimental evidence, which needs to be complemented by further investigations, 3 the introduction of a coefficient to account for casting position is tentatively proposed, as follows 4 :…”

Section: Effect Of Casting Position (Top Bar Effect)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Tension versus flexure: Reasons to modify the formulation of MC 2010 for cracking

Caldentey

García

Gribniak

et al. 2020

Structural Concrete

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper critically evaluates the cracking model of MC 2010 with a view to the drafting of MC 2020. It emphasizes that there are differences in cracking behavior in tension and bending, which are not adequately recognized in the current model. Based on the analysis of experimental evidence, it shows that the current model has a significant skew in prediction performance when tension and flexure tests are considered separately. Based on these observations, modifications are proposed to account for the variation of tensile stresses

show abstract

Section: Effect Of Casting Position (Top Bar Effect)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…3 A test program is under way at the Technical University of Madrid for this purpose. 4 The value of 0.9 is used for good casting position, because then the calibration factor for the bond term is equal to the theoretical value of 1/4. So, this choice-which may seem strange-is made for aesthetical reasons.…”

Section: Orcidmentioning

confidence: 99%