Biomedical Engineering - Technical Applications in Medicine 2012
DOI: 10.5772/50574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fiber Optic-Based Pressure Sensing Surface for Skin Health Management in Prosthetic and Rehabilitation Interventions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8b) may allow the evaluation of normal and shear stresses with high sensitivity. They have been recently embedded in a liner or in a socket [62]- [65]. The main disadvantage of these systems is the relatively high risk of damaging the fibers or the electronic components.…”
Section: B Sensing Technologies For Measuring Stress Distribution Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8b) may allow the evaluation of normal and shear stresses with high sensitivity. They have been recently embedded in a liner or in a socket [62]- [65]. The main disadvantage of these systems is the relatively high risk of damaging the fibers or the electronic components.…”
Section: B Sensing Technologies For Measuring Stress Distribution Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was obvious that the FBGs embedded in harder materials exhibit higher sensitivity and accuracy with both types of liners. Tsiokos et al suggested a pressure management system that works in two steps [ 120 ]. The first step is to measure pressure loads across the residual limb-socket interface in order to generate pressure maps that define pressure distribution.…”
Section: Types Of Transducersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attempts to produce sensors capable of measuring the pressure within prosthetic sockets have tended to involve piezoresistive [21][22][23], piezoelectric [24][25][26], capacitive [27][28][29][30], optical sensors [31][32][33][34][35][36][37] and microelectromechanical (MEMs) sensors [38][39][40][41].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%