Among the various diffusion MRI techniques, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is still most commonly used in clinical practice in order to investigate connectivity and fibre anatomy in the human brain. Besides its apparent advantages of a short acquisition time and noise robustness compared to other techniques, it suffers from its major weakness of assuming a single fibre model in each voxel. This constitutes a problem for DTI fibre tracking algorithms in regions with crossing fibres. Methods approaching this problem in a postprocessing step employ diffusion-like techniques to correct the directional information. We propose an extension of tensor voting in which information from voxels with a single fibre is used to infer orientation distributions in multi fibre voxels. The method is able to resolve multiple fibre orientations by clustering tensor votes instead of adding them up. Moreover, a new vote casting procedure is proposed which is appropriate even for small neighbourhoods. To account for the locality of DTI data, we use a small neighbourhood for distributing information at a time, but apply the algorithm iteratively to close larger gaps. The method shows promising results in both synthetic cases and for processing DTI-data of the human brain.Index Terms-Tensor voting, spherical clustering, DTI 1. INTRODUCTION Diffusion MRI techniques have been used to study connectivity between different regions in the human brain. Based on local diffusion profiles in the white matter, tractography methods can extract fibre paths that connect different regions.The most mature diffusion method is diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in which anisotropy and orientation of fibres are locally modelled through second-order tensors. The main drawback of DTI is that it is unable to resolve crossings of fibres, which are not unusual in the brain. There are two strategies for addressing this issue: either by using more advanced acquisition protocols such as high angular resolution diffusion imaging (HARDI) or by performing postprocessing of DTI data. Most of the previous work has followed the first strategy. However, it is noteworthy to mention that DTI has much shorter acquisition times and is less prone to motion artifacts than HARDI, which makes DTI more appropriate for clinical use. This means that methods following the latter