1993
DOI: 10.1002/neu.480241104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fiber pathways and positional changes in efferent perikarya of 2.5‐to 7‐day chick embryos as revealed with dil and dextran amiens

Abstract: The differentiation of facial motoneurons and inner ear (octaval) efferents was examined in chicken embryos by applying DiI or dextran amines to the cut VII/VIII nerve (peripheral label) or to the basal/floor plate of rhombomeres 4/5 (central label). Central labeling found axons of these efferent neurons to leave the brain as early as 2.5 days of incubation. Peripheral labeling identified cell bodies ipsilaterally in rhombomeres 4 and 5 at 2.5 days. Central labeling at 3.5 days showed these fibers to have full… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This path is the same as previously described by Boord (1961) for the cochlear and lagenar efferents in caiman and pigeon. Since others have studied the efferent projection in detail (Boord, 1961;Fritzsch et al, 1993;Simon and Lumsden, 1993;Code, 1995;Fritzsch, 1996;Kaiser and Manley, 1996;Manley and Köppl, 1998), we did not examine it except to see if any efferents sent collateral axons to NM or NA. We did not observe any labeled efferents projecting to NM or NA as a result of our injections and conclude that NM and NA do not receive collaterals from any inner ear efferent projections during the time examined in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This path is the same as previously described by Boord (1961) for the cochlear and lagenar efferents in caiman and pigeon. Since others have studied the efferent projection in detail (Boord, 1961;Fritzsch et al, 1993;Simon and Lumsden, 1993;Code, 1995;Fritzsch, 1996;Kaiser and Manley, 1996;Manley and Köppl, 1998), we did not examine it except to see if any efferents sent collateral axons to NM or NA. We did not observe any labeled efferents projecting to NM or NA as a result of our injections and conclude that NM and NA do not receive collaterals from any inner ear efferent projections during the time examined in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Facial BM neurons migrate tangentially from r4 into r6 orthogonal to the radial glial fibers, whereas trigeminal BM neurons in r2 migrate dorsolaterally along a non-radial pathway. Vestibuloacoustic cells display a third type of cell body movement, migrating across the midline at r4 to the contralateral side of the hindbrain (Chandrasekhar, 2004;Fritzsch et al, 1993;Simon and Lumsden, 1993). The last step in the migration of these motor neuron subtypes is shared, comprising the radial migration of the cell bodies toward their final settling position near the pial surface of the neural tube.…”
Section: Tbx20 Regulates Cell Body Migration Of Trigeminal Facial Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3), suggesting that mammalian auditory nuclei derive from rhombomeres 2 to 6. Unfortunately, no such specific basilar papilla data on initial projections into rhombomeres exist in birds in which only the entire ear projections have been mapped during early development when they can be related to rhombomeres [40].…”
Section: Rhombomeric Origin Of Vestibular and Cochlear Nucleimentioning
confidence: 99%