2023
DOI: 10.22382/wfs-2023-10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fiber Quality Prediction Using Nir Spectral Data: Tree-Based Ensemble Learning VS Deep Neural Networks

Abstract: The growing applications of near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy in wood quality control and monitoring necessitates focusing on data-driven methods to develop predictive models. Despite the advancements in analyzing NIR spectral data, literature on wood science and engineering has mainly utilized the classic model development methods, such as principal component analysis (PCA) regression or partial least squares (PLS) regression, with relatively limited studies conducted on evaluating machine learning (ML) models… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Training on tabular data, the general superior performance of models based on the gradient-boosted decision tree over deep learning methods has been reported, specifically where machine learning models outperformed deep learning models in regression [59]. Nasir et al (2023) [27] showed that tree-based gradient-boosting machines such as LGBMs, XGBoost, and TreeNet outperformed the ANN and CNN models when predicting fiber properties using NIR spectral data (with and without applying PCA). Thus, one might speculate that the LGBM model was so robust on the original training dataset that it did not experience significant improvement in its performance by changing the size of the training data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Training on tabular data, the general superior performance of models based on the gradient-boosted decision tree over deep learning methods has been reported, specifically where machine learning models outperformed deep learning models in regression [59]. Nasir et al (2023) [27] showed that tree-based gradient-boosting machines such as LGBMs, XGBoost, and TreeNet outperformed the ANN and CNN models when predicting fiber properties using NIR spectral data (with and without applying PCA). Thus, one might speculate that the LGBM model was so robust on the original training dataset that it did not experience significant improvement in its performance by changing the size of the training data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ANNs are biologically inspired mathematical models that can explain variations in almost any type of dataset with a good degree of accuracy. Therefore, these are one of the most widely used deep learning neural networks for regression and classification [ 27 ]. ANNs consist of input, hidden, and output layers, with the layers consisting of neurons that are interconnected by weighted links [ 50 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The spectra were classified using a TreeNet gradient boosting machine, a tree-based ensemble learning model. The model could successfully handle NIR spectra without the need for prior dimensionality reduction and was shown to outperform the ANN and convolutional neural network (CNN) for fiber quality prediction using NIR data [43]. Gradient boosting machines have been used in the wood science and technology literature for wood species identification [44] and predicting the properties of wood composites [45].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%