We show that the theory of derivators (or, more generally, of fibered multiderivators) on all small categories is equivalent to this theory on partially ordered sets, in the following sense: Every derivator (more generally, every fibered multiderivator) defined on partially ordered sets has an enlargement to all small categories that is unique up to equivalence of derivators. Furthermore, extending a theorem of Cisinski, we show that every bifibration of multi-model categories (basically a collection of model categories, and Quillen adjunctions in several variables between them) gives rise to a left and right fibered multiderivator on all small categories.1 Small categories Along the lines we also prove that a left (or right) fibered multiderivator defined on a smaller diagram category can be intrinsically enlarged to a larger diagram category, whenever some nervelike construction is available, relating the two diagram categories. This is more of theoretical interest because most derivators occurring in nature come from model categories. One concrete result of the construction is the following: Corollary 1.2. Let D → S be a left (resp. right) fibered multiderivator with domain Invpos 2 (resp. Dirpos 3 ) such that S is defined on Cat and such that also (FDer0 right) (resp. (FDer0 left)) holds. Then there exists an enlargement of D to a left (resp. right) fibered multiderivator E → S with domain Cat, such that its restriction to Invpos (resp. Dirpos) is equivalent to D. Any other such enlargement is equivalent to E.Note that this holds, in particular, for usual derivators (take for S the final pre-derivator) and closed monoidal derivators (take for S the final pre-multiderivator).Proof. In the left case, apply the machine of Theorem 4.1 twice using the functors N constructed in Proposition 2.5, firstly for the pair (Invpos ⊂ Cat ○ ), and secondly for the pair (Inv ⊂ Cat). Similarly for the right case.If we start with a fibered multiderivator on all of Pos, however, we show that the two extensions to Cat agree. Therefore we arrive at the following Corollary 1.3. Let D → S be a left and right fibered multiderivator with domain Pos such that S is defined on Cat. Then there exists a canonical enlargement of D to a left and right fibered multiderivator E → S with domain Cat, such that its restriction to Pos is equivalent to D. The enlargement is unique up to equivalence of fibered multiderivators over S.Actually, here Pos can be even replaced by the smallest diagram category containing both Invpos and Dirpos.Proof. We consider this time the pairs (Pos ⊂ Cat ○ ) and (Cat ○ ⊂ Cat). For each of these pairs we dispose of functors N as in 2.3 for the left and the right case simultaneously by Proposition 2.5 (by enlarging Dia ′ we only weaken the axioms). Hence we may conclude by applying Proposition 4.10 twice.For the reader mainly interested in plain (left and right) derivators, we state explicitly: Corollary 1.4. Let D be a derivator with domain Pos. Then there exists a canonical enlargement of D to a derivator E with doma...