ObjectiveDifficult airway management is a key skill required by all pediatric
physicians, yet training on multiple modalities is lacking. The objective of
this study was to compare the rate of, and time to, successful advanced
infant airway placement with direct laryngoscopy, video-assisted
laryngoscopy, and laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in a difficult airway
simulator. This study is the first to compare the success with 3 methods for
difficult airway management among pediatric trainees.Study DesignRandomized crossover pilot study.SettingTertiary academic medical center.MethodsTwenty-two pediatric residents, interns, and medical students were tested.
Participants were provided 1 training session by faculty using a normal
infant manikin. Subjects then performed all 3 of the aforementioned advanced
airway modalities in a randomized order on a difficult airway model of a
Robin sequence. Success was defined as confirmed endotracheal intubation or
correct LMA placement by the testing instructor in ≤120 seconds.ResultsDirect laryngoscopy demonstrated a significantly higher placement success
rate (77.3%) than video-assisted laryngoscopy (36.4%, P =
.0117) and LMA (31.8%, P = .0039). Video-assisted
laryngoscopy required a significantly longer amount of time during
successful intubations (84.8 seconds; 95% CI, 59.4-110.1) versus direct
laryngoscopy (44.9 seconds; 95% CI, 33.8-55.9) and LMA placement (36.6
seconds; 95% CI, 24.7-48.4).ConclusionsPediatric trainees demonstrated significantly higher success using direct
laryngoscopy in a difficult airway simulator model. However, given the
potential lifesaving implications of advanced airway adjuncts, including
video-assisted laryngoscopy and LMA placement, more extensive training on
adjunctive airway management techniques may be useful for trainees.