2013
DOI: 10.1002/suco.201300021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fibre‐reinforced concrete in fib Model Code 2010: principles, models and test validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
146
0
7

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
146
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking α = 0.2 and d n = 0.2h sp results in k 1 = 1.25 and k 1 k 2 ≈ 1. This is similar to the value determined in [8,11] for the case where α = 0.2 and d n = 0.2h sp and where the notch effect is ignored (i.e. k 2 = 1.0).…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Taking α = 0.2 and d n = 0.2h sp results in k 1 = 1.25 and k 1 k 2 ≈ 1. This is similar to the value determined in [8,11] for the case where α = 0.2 and d n = 0.2h sp and where the notch effect is ignored (i.e. k 2 = 1.0).…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…To further validate the model, data was collated from the studies of Colombo [34] (used in di Prisco et al [11] for comparison with fib Model Code 2010 [10] model) and Deluce [35]. In these studies, both indirect and direct tension tests were performed on SFRC produced from the same mix.…”
Section: Simplified Model For Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case, the tensile law should be defined in terms of σ − w , based on the fracture mechanics approach (discrete crack formulation). If the UHPFRC exhibits a strain hardening response before localization, the average space between cracks can be considered to be the link between strain and crack opening before localization (see also [55]). A simplified inverse analysis method is also proposed in [35], based on four-point bending tests.…”
Section: Mechanical Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For SFRC, the difference between the two tests (three or four-point bending test) is not so large when a careful non-linear computation is carried out (18). RILEM proposes a three-point bending test, but in this study a fourpoint load arrangement was adopted as it creates a region of constant moment at the middle of the prism and minimises the load-spreading effect at the point of load application (19).…”
Section: Bending Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%