2010
DOI: 10.1088/1748-6041/5/2/025002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fibroblastic response and surface characterization of O 2 -plasma-treated thermoplastic polyetherurethane

Abstract: Injection-molded samples of thermoplastic polyetherurethane (TPU) were treated with low-temperature oxygen plasma for different processing times in order to enhance cellular attachment for a gastric implant. Its effects were investigated by contact angle measurement, surface topography, cytotoxicity and cell colonization tests. No significant changes were found in the surface roughness of plasma treatment with plasma treatment time of less than 5 min. Longer treatment showed significantly higher surface roughn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the last decades, various techniques of surface treatment, such as the herein applied plasma etching, have been studied in the field of life sciences with the primary aim to improve the biological response to implanted biomaterials. [25][26][27][28] However, dependent on the applied technique and the biomaterial used for modification the resulting surface characteristics may significantly differ from each other. Moreover, there is not a clear correlation between individual surface properties and cellular reactions, because each cell type may behave differently on a modified surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last decades, various techniques of surface treatment, such as the herein applied plasma etching, have been studied in the field of life sciences with the primary aim to improve the biological response to implanted biomaterials. [25][26][27][28] However, dependent on the applied technique and the biomaterial used for modification the resulting surface characteristics may significantly differ from each other. Moreover, there is not a clear correlation between individual surface properties and cellular reactions, because each cell type may behave differently on a modified surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to surface topography, the hydrophilicity of polymers influences cell attachment. 40,41 Fibroblasts have been shown to attach optimally on the hydrophilic surface with a water contact angle between 50-60 . 42,43 Figure 4a demonstrated that fibroblasts preferred to be cultured on nylon 6,6 scaffolds over PET scaffolds, irrespective of whether the fibres were round or multilobal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase of the surface roughness and, consequently, the hydrophilicity by means of plasma etching is a widely used method to improve the biological response to implanted biomaterials. 40,41 Therefore, it was analyzed whether this approach also enhances the vascularization and incorporation of pPE implanted into mouse dorsal skinfold chambers. 30 However, the angiogenic host tissue response to plasma-etched pPE was delayed and less pronounced than that to untreated controls.…”
Section: Modification Of Surface Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%