2019
DOI: 10.1101/793141
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fibroblastic Reticular Cell Response to Dendritic Cells Requires Coordinated Activity of Podoplanin, CD44 and CD9

Abstract: Lymph node expansion is pivotal during immune activation. It is controlled by interactions between CLEC-2 hi migratory dendritic cells and podoplanin + fibroblastic reticular cells (FRCs) resulting in rapid loss of actomyosin contractility permitting FRC spreading. Podoplanin is an inflammatory marker in many pathologies, reported to facilitate both contractility and cell protrusions. However, how podoplanin expression is regulated, and how this one membrane protein can elicit these opposing phenotypes is unkn… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
(311 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…F-actin intensity through the T cell FRC network was quantified by using PDPN staining as a mask (Figure 1B). Whilst PDPN intensity increased (Figure 1C) as inflammation proceeded, as has been noted in other studies (10,27), F-actin cables were maintained in the network through to day 5 post immunisation (Figure 1D).…”
Section: Filamentous Actin Structures Persist In the Frc Network Through Ln Expansionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…F-actin intensity through the T cell FRC network was quantified by using PDPN staining as a mask (Figure 1B). Whilst PDPN intensity increased (Figure 1C) as inflammation proceeded, as has been noted in other studies (10,27), F-actin cables were maintained in the network through to day 5 post immunisation (Figure 1D).…”
Section: Filamentous Actin Structures Persist In the Frc Network Through Ln Expansionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Cell lines were maintained at 10% CO 2 , 37°C in Dulbecco's modified eagle medium (DMEM) (Thermo Fischer scientific) supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% P/S and 1% ITS unless otherwise stated. Cells were treated with recombinant CLEC2-Fc or Control-Fc supernatant (16,27) for approximately 2 hours, where indicated, to assay the effect of CLEC2 signalling through PDPN. Figure 3C is a paired analysis of the same cell before and 15 minutes after CLEC-2 treatment.…”
Section: Cell Linesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, podoplanin and CCL21 interact with each other on LECs [128], but a role of this interaction in DC migration has not been directly addressed. Loss of tetraspanin CD9, a partner protein of podoplanin [129], or tetraspanin CD82 causes a decrease in podoplanin surface expression [130,131]. Although DCs could still bind to and interact with CD9-deficient FRCs [130], the role of tetraspanins in CLEC-2/podoplanindependent DC migration has not been studied.…”
Section: Migration Through Lymphatics and Entry Into The Lymph Nodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In FRCs, podoplanin promotes actomyosin contractility through its binding to ERM proteins and activation of RhoA GTPase, and binding of CLEC-2 located on migratory dendritic cells inhibits podoplanin-induced contractility, resulting in FRC spreading and elongation to allow a rapid lymph node expansion [ 21 , 74 ]. In a recent report, de Winde and colleagues suggest that upon binding of CLEC-2 to FRCs, podoplanin is recruited to cholesterol-rich domains (lipid rafts) where interacts with membrane partners CD44 and CD9 to form cell protrusions and to spread [ 75 ]. In fibrosarcoma cells, podoplanin–CD9 interaction neutralizes podoplanin-mediated platelet aggregation via binding to CLEC-2 and suppresses metastasis [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%