2008
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.024877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fibrogenic fibroblasts increase intercellular adhesion strength by reinforcing individual OB-cadherin bonds

Abstract: depolymerization reduces single-bond strength to the level of cadherin constructs missing the cytoplasmic domain. Hence, fibroblasts reinforce intercellular contacts by: (1) switching from N-to OB-cadherin expression; (2) increasing the strength of single-molecule bonds in three distinct steps; and (3) actinpromoted intrinsic activation of cadherin extracellular binding. We propose that this plasticity adapts fibroblast adhesions to the changing mechanical microenvironment of tissue under remodeling. Supplemen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
80
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
4
80
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Since those beads coated with a small number of N-cadherin ligands are likely to attach to very few receptors (Thoumine and Meister, 2000), the retrapping events were interpreted as the breaking of a small number of molecular bonds. Because the forces involved are much lower than the 30 -100 pN interaction between individual cadherin molecules (Perret et al, 2004;Pittet et al, 2008), and because beads remain attached to the growth cone surface when the trap is stopped, rupture is unlikely to occur between N-cadherin ligands and receptors. Instead, the 1 pN retrapping events more likely correspond to the rupture of single bonds between the cadherin-catenin complex and actin, which were proposed previously to be highly dynamic .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since those beads coated with a small number of N-cadherin ligands are likely to attach to very few receptors (Thoumine and Meister, 2000), the retrapping events were interpreted as the breaking of a small number of molecular bonds. Because the forces involved are much lower than the 30 -100 pN interaction between individual cadherin molecules (Perret et al, 2004;Pittet et al, 2008), and because beads remain attached to the growth cone surface when the trap is stopped, rupture is unlikely to occur between N-cadherin ligands and receptors. Instead, the 1 pN retrapping events more likely correspond to the rupture of single bonds between the cadherin-catenin complex and actin, which were proposed previously to be highly dynamic .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 A, B) or pulled away by centrifuging the cultures upside down (data not shown). We estimate that such protocols produced mechanical forces of ϳ200 -250 pN on the beads (see Materials and Methods), the strength of approximately five cadherin molecular bridges (Perret et al, 2004;Pittet et al, 2008). Therefore, this long-term adhesion assay reflects rather strong contacts involving several N-cadherin molecules.…”
Section: Weak Correlation Between N-cadherin Binding Strength and Gromentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Myofibroblast differentiation is accompanied by the formation of cell-cell adherens junctions that intercellularly couple contractile stress fibres (Hinz and Gabbiani, 2003a;Hinz et al, 2004;Pittet et al, 2008). In the intracellular portion of adherens junctions, actin filament bundles associate with a protein complex that contains catenins and which mediates binding to the cytoplasmic tail of transmembrane cadherins (Gumbiner, 2005;Nagafuchi, 2001;Weis and Nelson, 2006;Wheelock and Johnson, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These systems allow simultaneous acquisition of the AFM signal and an optical image [21]. These systems promise bright outcomes, being applied in the fields of cancer research [22], cell adhesion [23], actin skeleton structure [24] and protein recognition [21]. In addition, several laboratories are developing high speed AFMs that produce images at "video" speed, higher than 25 frames per second.…”
Section: Outcomes In Function-related Imaging By Afmmentioning
confidence: 99%