2022
DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000030025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fibroscan® and Shear Wave correlated well in hepatic fibrosis evaluation of patients with chronic liver diseases “in real life situation”

Abstract: Background: A new noninvasive medical device based on ultrasound elastography such as the Shear Wave Elastography (SWE) was designed in order to measure the liver hardness. The purpose of this work was to evaluate the correlation of the results of the liver elasticity measurements obtained by Fibroscan® (FS) and SWE for patients with chronic liver diseases. Methods: Between January and October 2017, the patients who were followed during this period of time underwent non… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The potential benefit of SWE compared to Fibroscan™ in TS is that ultrasound images can assess for adenomas and vascular changes in addition to providing measurements of steatosis and fibrosis that are more specific than Fib-4 and APRI. [19][20][21] Our findings suggest that continuing annual serologic evaluation and calculating fibrosis risk scores based on serologic testing is a helpful screening tool, but given its low specificity, may not diagnose steatosis or fibrosis in a subset of TS patients. Our study also shows that GGT is more sensitive than AST or ALT in identifying early liver changes.…”
Section: Ta B L E 3 Summary Statistics Between Ts Patients and Controlsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The potential benefit of SWE compared to Fibroscan™ in TS is that ultrasound images can assess for adenomas and vascular changes in addition to providing measurements of steatosis and fibrosis that are more specific than Fib-4 and APRI. [19][20][21] Our findings suggest that continuing annual serologic evaluation and calculating fibrosis risk scores based on serologic testing is a helpful screening tool, but given its low specificity, may not diagnose steatosis or fibrosis in a subset of TS patients. Our study also shows that GGT is more sensitive than AST or ALT in identifying early liver changes.…”
Section: Ta B L E 3 Summary Statistics Between Ts Patients and Controlsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…As a result, it is widely available, cost‐effective, and could be paired with annual serologic evaluation as a standard screening tool in patients with TS. The potential benefit of SWE compared to Fibroscan™ in TS is that ultrasound images can assess for adenomas and vascular changes in addition to providing measurements of steatosis and fibrosis that are more specific than Fib‐4 and APRI 19–21 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This device is used to perform elastic tissue ultrasonography, which is a method that allows us to measure the elasticity of soft tissues with numerical data. This method simultaneously gives the patient’s degree of fatty liver and the degree of possible fibrosis in the liver in light of numerical data 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%