1997
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.168.6.9168731
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fibrous pseudotumor of the epididymis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Since an early reference to a case of a peritesticular fibromatous mass by Sir Astley Cooper in 1830 and a case report by Balloch in 1904, 1,2 various case reports and small series have been published in the urology, pathology, and radiology literature. [2][3][4][5][6] Multiple other names have been applied to this and related entities, including chronic proliferative periorchitis, fibromatous periorchitis, pseudofibromatous periorchitis, reactive periorchitis, an inflammatory pseudotumor, nodular and diffuse fibrous proliferation of the tunica, a benign fibrous paratesticular tumor, granulomatous periorchitis, nonspecific peritesticular fibrosis, a nodular fibropseudotumor, and proliferative funiculitis, [7][8][9][10][11] partly reflecting the variable and overlapping spectrum of pathologic findings and various etiologic theories. Although the terminology, classification, and proposed pathogenesis have been confusing and controversial, these lesions are generally accepted to represent a benign reactive proliferation of inflammatory and fibrous tissue, likely in response to trauma, surgery, infection, or inflammation, as distinct from true benign fibrous neoplasms, which may also rarely occur in the testis and testicular tunics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since an early reference to a case of a peritesticular fibromatous mass by Sir Astley Cooper in 1830 and a case report by Balloch in 1904, 1,2 various case reports and small series have been published in the urology, pathology, and radiology literature. [2][3][4][5][6] Multiple other names have been applied to this and related entities, including chronic proliferative periorchitis, fibromatous periorchitis, pseudofibromatous periorchitis, reactive periorchitis, an inflammatory pseudotumor, nodular and diffuse fibrous proliferation of the tunica, a benign fibrous paratesticular tumor, granulomatous periorchitis, nonspecific peritesticular fibrosis, a nodular fibropseudotumor, and proliferative funiculitis, [7][8][9][10][11] partly reflecting the variable and overlapping spectrum of pathologic findings and various etiologic theories. Although the terminology, classification, and proposed pathogenesis have been confusing and controversial, these lesions are generally accepted to represent a benign reactive proliferation of inflammatory and fibrous tissue, likely in response to trauma, surgery, infection, or inflammation, as distinct from true benign fibrous neoplasms, which may also rarely occur in the testis and testicular tunics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Volume 227 ⅐ Number 1 Sonography of the Scrotum ⅐ 31testis. The proliferation can be hyperechoic or hypoechoic at US, and there is no other specific appearance(155).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9] Due to the amount of collagen, calcification or fibroblasts, fibrous pseudotumors can be hyperechoic or hypoechoic on ultrasound without another specific appearance. [10][11][12][13] Slight focal thickening of the tunica albuginea without abnormalities in the testicle may be detected by ultrasound. These lesions can be distinguished from most other testicular lesions according to ultrasound (US) findings, anatomic location, and negative tumor markers, but using these findings, determining the nature of these lesions (benign or malignant) radiologically is difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%