1884
DOI: 10.1037/12248-000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fichte's Science of knowledge: A critical exposition.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fechner's nature combined two contradictory elements. On the one hand, he was a romantic idealist, given to wide-ranging speculative thinking, under the influence of the nature philosophy of Oken (1809) and the idealism of Fichte (Everett, 1892), Schelling (Robinson, 1976), and Hegel (Stace, 1924(Stace, /1955. On the other hand, he was a careful, painstaking scientist, in the tradition of E. H. Weber and L. H. F. von Helmholtz.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fechner's nature combined two contradictory elements. On the one hand, he was a romantic idealist, given to wide-ranging speculative thinking, under the influence of the nature philosophy of Oken (1809) and the idealism of Fichte (Everett, 1892), Schelling (Robinson, 1976), and Hegel (Stace, 1924(Stace, /1955. On the other hand, he was a careful, painstaking scientist, in the tradition of E. H. Weber and L. H. F. von Helmholtz.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%