2009
DOI: 10.1002/num.20438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fictitious domain method with penalty for an incompressible fluid

Abstract: Fictitious domain method shows great advantages when handling problems with complex and constantly varying domains. In this article, we propose an algorithm which extends the fictitious domain method by introducing penalties. Test results with the numerical examples of backward facing step problem and the flow around steady and dynamic cylinder problem show that the algorithm we propose is highly efficient for solving incompressible fluid problems.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FDM is capable of simplifying the domain of the problem by using a regular fixed domain. This method has been in existence since the early 1950s and has been extensively used to solve problems such as: particle flow, heat transfer, fluid flow, shape and topology optimization, to name but a few [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. In 1999 Garcia and Steven [34], were amongst the first to applied FDM for structural shape optimization, calling the method Fixed-Grid Finite Elements Analysis (FG-FEA).…”
Section: Determination Of the Criteria Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FDM is capable of simplifying the domain of the problem by using a regular fixed domain. This method has been in existence since the early 1950s and has been extensively used to solve problems such as: particle flow, heat transfer, fluid flow, shape and topology optimization, to name but a few [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. In 1999 Garcia and Steven [34], were amongst the first to applied FDM for structural shape optimization, calling the method Fixed-Grid Finite Elements Analysis (FG-FEA).…”
Section: Determination Of the Criteria Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%