2024
DOI: 10.3390/math12020269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fictitious Point Technique Based on Finite-Difference Method for 2.5D Direct-Current Resistivity Forward Problem

Xiaozhong Tong,
Ya Sun

Abstract: With the widespread application of the direct-current resistivity method, searching for accurate and fast-forward algorithms has become the focus of research for geophysicists and engineers. Three-dimensional forward modeling can be the best way to identify geo-electrical anomalies but are hampered by computational limitations because of the large amount of data. A practical compromise, or even alternative, is represented by 2.5D modeling characterized using a 3D source in a 2D medium. Thus, we develop a 2.5D … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerical modeling approaches, such as the finite-difference method (FDM) [12][13][14][15] and finite-element method (FEM) [16][17][18], have been applied for high-dimensional directcurrent-resistivity forward modeling and inversion. The FDM utilizes difference operators to approximate the first or second partial derivatives in the partial differential equation (PDE), but its effectiveness is limited to a relatively flat topography.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical modeling approaches, such as the finite-difference method (FDM) [12][13][14][15] and finite-element method (FEM) [16][17][18], have been applied for high-dimensional directcurrent-resistivity forward modeling and inversion. The FDM utilizes difference operators to approximate the first or second partial derivatives in the partial differential equation (PDE), but its effectiveness is limited to a relatively flat topography.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%