2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2014.05.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fidelity susceptibility and quantum Fisher information for density operators with arbitrary ranks

Abstract: Abstract. Taking into account the density matrices with non-full ranks, we show that the fidelity susceptibility is determined by the support of the density matrix. Combining with the corresponding expression of the quantum Fisher information, we rigorously prove that the fidelity susceptibility is proportional to the quantum Fisher information. As this proof can be naturally extended to the full rank case, this proportional relation is generally established for density matrices with arbitrary ranks. Furthermo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For non-full rank density matrix, the expression of the QFI F θ can be rewritten as [32,[38][39][40]]…”
Section: The Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For non-full rank density matrix, the expression of the QFI F θ can be rewritten as [32,[38][39][40]]…”
Section: The Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, Liu et al provided an analytical expression of the QFIM determined only by the support of the density matrix [61]. Based on the spectral decomposition of ρ(θ)…”
Section: Technical Preliminaries Of Qfimmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, C d−M is actually undefined here. However, since C d−M is also not involved in the calculation of QFI [22,23], therefore, it will not bring indeterminacy on the final expression of QFI. Based on this reason, we can simply take C d−M = 0 for convenience.…”
Section: Lyapunov Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the QFI is actually the variance of SLD operator, i.e., F = ∆ 2 L , with ∆ 2 L := (L − L ) 2 . The SLD operator has been studied for years [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. It is important for two reasons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%