2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.gfj.2022.100709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fiduciary or loyalty? Evidence from top management counsel and stock liquidity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To address this concern, we conduct additional robustness checks. First, we follow Michael et al (2022) and use a propensity score matching (PSM) sample. Specifically, we define a treatment (control) firm as one located above (below) the median gambling culture in a province.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this concern, we conduct additional robustness checks. First, we follow Michael et al (2022) and use a propensity score matching (PSM) sample. Specifically, we define a treatment (control) firm as one located above (below) the median gambling culture in a province.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dependent variable in the current study is SL. Most prior studies employed the Amihud illiquidity measure (2002) to estimate SL (e.g., Bazrafshan et al, 2021;Khan et al, 2022;Abidi and Nsaibi, 2022;Michael et al, 2022) because it is strongly associated with the high-frequency price impact benchmark, allows a better understanding of liquidity premium, and the simplicity of its construction (Lou and Shu, 2017). This measure can be illustrated by the ratio of the absolute stock return to the trading volume of the stock as follows (Amihud, 2002): Where ILLIQiy refers to the value of stock illiquidity for a firm (i), on a day (d), and a year (y).…”
Section: Variables Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, we use six control variables (firm size, financial leverage, firm age, earnings per share, market-to-book ratio, and audit firm size) which can be probably associated with SL (Bazrafshan et al, 2021;Michael et al, 2022;Khan et al, 2022;Abidi and Nsaibi, 2022). Firm size is estimated by the natural logarithm of total assets, financial leverage is measured by total liabilities divided by total assets, firm age is the natural logarithm of the number of years from the year of incorporation, earnings per share is calculated by net income divided by total shares outstanding, the market-to-book ratio is measured by dividing the market value of equity by the book value of equity, and audit firm size is calculated by a dummy variable that matches one when the auditor is a Big 4 firm and zero otherwise.…”
Section: Variables Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, providing evidence that local gambling is related to higher risk-taking vis-à-vis earnings volatility is essential to the story of a positive effect of local gambling preference on earnings management. We follow Michael et al (2022) and use firm earnings volatility as the standard deviation of prior fiveyear return on equity (ROE), to test this prediction. The results in column ( 4) of Table 7 show that local gambling preference positively and significantly affects earnings volatility.…”
Section: Gambling Preferences Earnings Volatility and Earnings Manage...mentioning
confidence: 99%