2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2009.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field appraisement of olive mills solid waste application in olive crops: Effect on herbicide retention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the results of a previous field study on diuron in which the amount of diuron recovered increased significantly in the 7 years of amending the soils with OW, compared to unamended soils. The present results also agree with those of previous reports indicating increased persistence of terbuthylazine in soils treated with different organic amendments (Cabrera et al , 2009Navarro et al 2003;Dolaptsoglou et al 2009). Although the increases in persistence obtained with OW Fig.…”
Section: Field Studiessupporting
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is consistent with the results of a previous field study on diuron in which the amount of diuron recovered increased significantly in the 7 years of amending the soils with OW, compared to unamended soils. The present results also agree with those of previous reports indicating increased persistence of terbuthylazine in soils treated with different organic amendments (Cabrera et al , 2009Navarro et al 2003;Dolaptsoglou et al 2009). Although the increases in persistence obtained with OW Fig.…”
Section: Field Studiessupporting
confidence: 96%
“…These results are not coherent with those of the leaching studies (see Fig. 3), indicative of the differences between disturbed and undisturbed systems when assessing the leaching behaviour of pesticides in soils (Cabrera et al 2009). Moreover, the presence of inert ingredients (20%) in the commercial pesticide used in the field experiments, together with the large total amount of 0.01 M CaCl 2 added in the laboratory columns (equivalent to 1,476 mm) compared with the weak rainfall observed over the complete period of the field study (total amounts of 166.8 and 172.9 mm for 2005 and 2007, respectively), would also have contributed to the observed differences in the results under controlled or field conditions.…”
Section: Field Studiesmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…C+CM, soil amended with CW at rate of 10% (10 g of soil + 1 g of CW) 3. C+MSW, soil amended with MSW at a rate of 16.3% (10 g of soil + 1.63 g of CW) Diflufenican sorption was determined according to Cabrera et al (2009) criteria. Triplicate samples (5 g) of the unamended and organic amended soil (C, C+CM and C+MSW) were treated with 10 ml of diflufenican (50%:50%, v/v) solution (initial concentrations, Ci, ranging from to 50 µM in 0.01 CaCl 2 ).…”
Section: Laboratory Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%