“…Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, a range of tools from simple voice interfaces to interactive social robots have been introduced with the aim of providing stimulation, entertainment, personal assistance, monitoring and safety for older adults and PwD ( Inoue et al, 2012 ; MartÃn et al, 2013 ; Mordoch et al, 2013 ; Joranson et al, 2015 ; Moyle et al, 2017 ; Falck et al, 2020 ); see ( Abdi et al, 2018 ) for a recent review. Exemplary cases such as the humanoid robot NAO ( Agüera-Ortiz et al, 2015 ), PaPeRo ( Inoue et al, 2012 ), Bandit ( Tapus et al, 2009 ), Eva ( Cruz-Sandoval and Favela, 2016 ), and robot alternatives to animal assisted therapy such as AIBO, the robotic dog ( Tamura et al, 2004 ), NeCoRo, the robotic cat ( Libin and Cohen-Mansfield, 2004 ), and the well-known Paro, the robotic seal ( Wada and Shibata, 2007 ) have shown the possibility of improving patient engagement, reducing agitation, improving mood and communication, and decreasing stress ( Inoue et al, 2011 ; Petersen et al, 2017 ), though comparable results have been argued with a simple stuffed animal ( Moyle et al, 2017 ). Recent literature ( MartÃn et al, 2013 ; Valenti Soler et al, 2015 ; Rouaix et al, 2017 ) has argued social robots can help improve irritability, global neuropsychiatric symptoms, and PwD’s emotional responses with robot assisted therapies.…”