2021
DOI: 10.1049/mia2.12076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field calculation of electric dipole excitation of a metafilm printed on a finite‐thickness dielectric slab using the susceptibility homogenization method

Abstract: Here, the authors calculate the fields due to the electric dipole that excites a homogenized metasurface which is printed on a finite thickness dielectric slab. The problem is solved by replacing the total parts below the periodic array which contain the dielectric slab and the half-space under it, with an effective homogenous half-space. Furthermore, the static interaction constants between dipoles which are located at two different materials' interface are calculated. Then, with the help of the Lorentz metho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The approach in [32] is extended for metafilms at the interface of two half spaces in [33] and for metasurfaces placed on a dielectric slab in [34]. Since the numerical results are reported for total fields, a significant difference between the results for two different dielectric constants (5 and 16), [33], and for two slabs of same permittivity but with different heights (2 mm and 10 mm), [34], is not observed again due to the dominance of the incident field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach in [32] is extended for metafilms at the interface of two half spaces in [33] and for metasurfaces placed on a dielectric slab in [34]. Since the numerical results are reported for total fields, a significant difference between the results for two different dielectric constants (5 and 16), [33], and for two slabs of same permittivity but with different heights (2 mm and 10 mm), [34], is not observed again due to the dominance of the incident field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%