SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2008 2008
DOI: 10.1190/1.3054783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field data comparison: 3C‐2D data acquisition with geophones and accelerometers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the mid-2000s, numerous papers compare the traditional, one component coil geophones employed in the geophysical exploration with several types of MEMS accelerometers or examined the results after lab and field experimental tests [73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86]. For the early generations of sensors, the results were not so favourable; later, the results indicate, all things considered, better performance for active seismic surveys.…”
Section: Application Of Capacitive Mems Accelerometers To Seismologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the mid-2000s, numerous papers compare the traditional, one component coil geophones employed in the geophysical exploration with several types of MEMS accelerometers or examined the results after lab and field experimental tests [73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86]. For the early generations of sensors, the results were not so favourable; later, the results indicate, all things considered, better performance for active seismic surveys.…”
Section: Application Of Capacitive Mems Accelerometers To Seismologymentioning
confidence: 99%