2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-019-05485-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field dependence–independence differently affects retrospective time estimation and flicker-induced time dilation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following Tascón and colleagues [ 46 ], since the EFT does not have a scale to divide FIs and FDs and taking into consideration that the individual’s predisposition toward field dependence and field independence is along a continuum, the median-split technique was applied. This method has also been used not only in previous studies on the interplay between FDI and creativity [ 36 , 38 , 47 ] but also in other research areas, including perception [ 48 ], spatial cognition [ 46 ], and problem solving [ 49 ]. Participants were divided by the median-split of the EFT score (average solution times).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Tascón and colleagues [ 46 ], since the EFT does not have a scale to divide FIs and FDs and taking into consideration that the individual’s predisposition toward field dependence and field independence is along a continuum, the median-split technique was applied. This method has also been used not only in previous studies on the interplay between FDI and creativity [ 36 , 38 , 47 ] but also in other research areas, including perception [ 48 ], spatial cognition [ 46 ], and problem solving [ 49 ]. Participants were divided by the median-split of the EFT score (average solution times).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Present results suggest that differences between FD and FI in timing tasks may be also observed in prospective paradigms. More in detail, finding that FI individuals specifically performed better in the internally-based condition of the temporal learning task supports the possibility that the advantage of a stronger predisposition towards field-independence is specifically apparent in timing tasks in which the use of an internal frame of reference is needed (Teghil et al, 2019a;Witkin, 1977). Interestingly, if this were the case, such differences should be apparent also in prospective timing tasks involving durations longer than those tested in the present study, since the use of an internal frame of reference could help more FI individuals to disambiguate overlapping memory traces of experienced durations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Previous studies have also suggested that more FI individuals perform better than more FD ones in suprasecond retrospective timing tasks (Silverman et al, 1961;Teghil et al, 2019a). This advantage has been ascribed to the higher cognitive restructuring skills of FI individuals (Teghil et al, 2019a), that allow them to disengage from external cues, and generally to perform better in tasks in which the material lacks an organization or is ambiguous (Witkin, 1977).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It’s our view, that one gets power per pound … by increasing the number of time intervals to be estimated than by having several replications of each estimate (but we have not yet tested this mathematically)”. A fifth limitation to note is that there is no focus on entrainment to the flicker rate (Allman et al, 2014 ; Brighouse et al, 2014 ; Herbst et al, 2013 ; Matell & Meck, 2004 ; Teghil et al, 2019 ; Wearden et al, 2017 ; Wiener & Kanai, 2016 ), and this is certainly a topic to be addressed in future studies using this experimental protocol, using a reasonable sample size. Clearly, sample size is the major limitation of the present study, which, as a pilot n = 1 study, has achieved its objectives: showing the efficacy of the experimental protocol; demonstrating the quality of the data that can be generated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, sample size is the major limitation of the present study, which, as a pilot n = 1 study, has achieved its objectives: showing the efficacy of the experimental protocol; demonstrating the quality of the data that can be generated. The study needs to be replicated; more data are needed; individual differences in performance – especially while exposed to flicker – due to personality (Glicksohn & Naftuliev, 2005 ) and/or cognitive style (Teghil et al, 2019 ) need to be considered. Clearly, there is much to explore here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%