1983
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.27.4467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field dependences of magnetization and specific-heat coefficient in a nearly magnetic system: LiquidHe3and strong Pauli paramagnets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…is the electronic densities of states) is the electronic contribution, which can be calculated from band-structure calculations, and δ sf is the contribution of the spin fluctuations [6,23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is the electronic densities of states) is the electronic contribution, which can be calculated from band-structure calculations, and δ sf is the contribution of the spin fluctuations [6,23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) that an anomaly in S would be a maximum at m c . 2] This implies that -TdB m /dT is positive for m <m c and negative for m> m c , so that its effect would be to create in Br(rn) a stronger plateau than in B m (m).…”
Section: The Correction T(db M /Dt)mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The corrections Q\ g and () cap are important in order to get this behavior, but do not influence the results for m>0. 2 (i.e., smaller times). Figure 3 shows that the susceptibility decreases monotonously when m and BT increase.…”
Section: The Correction T(db M /Dt)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Because of our partial polarization, a direct comparison is possible only for the nearly ferromagnetic model, where only the spin fluctuations are taken into account [1]. Béal-Monod and Daniel [23] have computed the temperature and field dependence of the magnetization M within this model up to order B 3 . Inverting this relation for M M͑B, T ͒, and using Maxwell's relation ͑ ≠S ≠M ͒ T 2͑ ≠B ≠T ͒ M , we deduced the polarization dependence of specific heat up to order m 4 .…”
Section: (Received 24 March 2000)mentioning
confidence: 99%