2014
DOI: 10.2134/fg-2013-0104-rs
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field Drying‐Rate Differences Among Three Cool‐Season Grasses

Abstract: Conserving cool‐season grasses as silage or hay remains a challenge due to the time required for field curing and the unpredictability of the weather. We compared the drying rates of three grasses with differing yield potential, morphology, and physical characteristics. Inflorescence‐stage meadow fescue (Festuca pratensis Huds. subsp. pratensis [syn. Schedonorus pratensis (Huds.) P. Beauv.]), orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.), and reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) were cut and swathed with field‐sc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The drier nature of orchardgrass forages reflects more rapid field wilting that is likely explained by swaths that were less dense, and with a complete absence of stem tissue. Brink et al (2014) compared the field drying rates of 3 cool-season grasses [meadow fescue, orchardgrass, and reed canarygrass (Phalaris aruninacea L.)] grown in southern Wisconsin, and concluded that forage species likely has little effect on drying rates. Although windrow densities and leaf-to-stem ratios varied across forages in that study, the nonflowering response reported for our orchardgrass forages was not observed.…”
Section: Bale Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drier nature of orchardgrass forages reflects more rapid field wilting that is likely explained by swaths that were less dense, and with a complete absence of stem tissue. Brink et al (2014) compared the field drying rates of 3 cool-season grasses [meadow fescue, orchardgrass, and reed canarygrass (Phalaris aruninacea L.)] grown in southern Wisconsin, and concluded that forage species likely has little effect on drying rates. Although windrow densities and leaf-to-stem ratios varied across forages in that study, the nonflowering response reported for our orchardgrass forages was not observed.…”
Section: Bale Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%