2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2006.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field emission characteristics of microcrystalline diamond films: Effect of surface coverage and thickness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The field at which an emission current density of 0.92 mA cm À2 is achieved is considered a figure of merit for conventional flat panel displays, as well as for a continuous diamond film (0.13 mA cm À2 at 98 V mm À1 ). The value for the present system is less than 90 V mm À1 , which is better than previously reported values for various field emitting materials including microdiamond films (Arora & Vankar, 2006), but worse than those of oriented nano-, submicro-and microdiamond films. For these films, Wang et al (2002) noticed higher current densities of 780, 300 and 180 mA cm À2 for applied voltages of 1.5, 10 and 25 V mm À1 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…The field at which an emission current density of 0.92 mA cm À2 is achieved is considered a figure of merit for conventional flat panel displays, as well as for a continuous diamond film (0.13 mA cm À2 at 98 V mm À1 ). The value for the present system is less than 90 V mm À1 , which is better than previously reported values for various field emitting materials including microdiamond films (Arora & Vankar, 2006), but worse than those of oriented nano-, submicro-and microdiamond films. For these films, Wang et al (2002) noticed higher current densities of 780, 300 and 180 mA cm À2 for applied voltages of 1.5, 10 and 25 V mm À1 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…This value is better than previously reported values for various field-emitting materials including microdiamond films, but worse than that of oriented nanodiamond, submicrodiamond, and microdiamond film. 5,42,43 The SEM image in Fig. 6͑a͒ and 6͑b͒ shows the well-faceted microdiamond films ͑thickness: ϳ2 m͒ have been deposited on the Si surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diamond films possess many excellent physical and chemical properties [1][2][3] and have been the focus of intensive research since the successful synthesis of diamond by lowpressure and low-temperature chemical vapor deposition (CVD). 4) The negative electron affinity (NEA) 5) of diamond films observed for a reconstructed (100) surface renders these films of great potential for applications as electron field emitters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%