1956
DOI: 10.1016/s0065-2539(08)61226-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field Emission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
123
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 303 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
1
123
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This asymmetry is the strongest in the case of the W electrode and the least pronounced for the Ir electrode. Using a combination of direct tunneling 16,29 and Fowler-Nordheim tunneling, 30,31 we could very well describe the experimental results. 32 We considered the current density to be J = J DT + p FN × J FN , where J DT and J FN correspond to the contributions from direct tunneling and from Fowler-Nordheim tunneling, respectively, as both taken from Ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…This asymmetry is the strongest in the case of the W electrode and the least pronounced for the Ir electrode. Using a combination of direct tunneling 16,29 and Fowler-Nordheim tunneling, 30,31 we could very well describe the experimental results. 32 We considered the current density to be J = J DT + p FN × J FN , where J DT and J FN correspond to the contributions from direct tunneling and from Fowler-Nordheim tunneling, respectively, as both taken from Ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Appropriate corrections were introduced into mainstream CFE theory in the 1950s [24][25][26][27], most definitively by Murphy and Good (MG) [27]. The outcome was the revised FN-type equation…”
Section: Figure 1 Near Herementioning
confidence: 99%
“…FE refers to the quantum-mechanical phenomenon of electron tunneling from a conductor into the vacuum through a surface potential barrier whose width is significantly reduced by a high local electric field [21][22][23][24][25]. The tunneling probability depends very strongly on the width of the potential barrier and decreases exponentially with increasing barrier width.…”
Section: Field Emission Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of β depends on the microscopic geometry of the emitters and is the most important factor that affects the FE performance. Nanomaterials with enormously high aspect ratios, such as CNCs and CNTs, are known to have very high β, and have been demonstrated to be excellent field emitters with low turn-on E fields [21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Field Emission Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%