2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00339-006-3482-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field enhancement factor for an array of MWNTs in CNT paste

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For field emission, the cathode was mounted in the center of the spherical anode in the vacuum chamber at pressure level ϳ3 ϫ 10 −5 Pa. The result is reasonable and in accordance with that obtained by Berdinsky et al 17 We can get a current density as high as 300 mA/ cm 2 ͑the current was 30 mA and the effective area was about 0.1 cm 2 ͒ for a voltage of 10 kV. Figure 3 shows the emission current stability.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…For field emission, the cathode was mounted in the center of the spherical anode in the vacuum chamber at pressure level ϳ3 ϫ 10 −5 Pa. The result is reasonable and in accordance with that obtained by Berdinsky et al 17 We can get a current density as high as 300 mA/ cm 2 ͑the current was 30 mA and the effective area was about 0.1 cm 2 ͒ for a voltage of 10 kV. Figure 3 shows the emission current stability.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The parameters are k 1 = 128.7, k 2 = 226.1 and G 0 = 8.99. And a is set to be 1.497 by referencing the work of Xue et al[41].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Среди экспериментаторов широко распространен метод определения площади эмиссии по анализу экспериментальной ВАХ [25,26]. В этом случае реальному катоду сопоставляется некий идеальный эмиттер с площадью S eff и однородным полем F eff на поверхности, которому соответствует эффективный коэффициент усиления поля β eff .…”
Section: варианты определения площади эмитирующей поверхностиunclassified