2018
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program, Where Is the L-Track?

Abstract: Background: Modifications of the Field Epidemiology Training Program (FETP) curricula to include a laboratory track (L-Track), to become Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program (FELTP), began in 2004 in Kenya. The L-Track offered candidates training on laboratory competencies in management, policy, quality systems, and diagnostic methods as well as epidemiology, disease surveillance and outbreak response. Since then several FELTPs have discontinued the L-Track and instead offer all candidates, epide… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge, examination of direct impacts is a frequent omission in the evaluation of FETP and other related epidemiological workforce training programs, where the emphasis of evaluation is focused on pre-and post-training knowledge and competencies, participation in surveillance and response activities, and career progression of graduates. [16][17][18][19][20] To this end, a monitoring and evaluation toolkit could still have the exibility to be customized to t the speci c needs and context of each country, but would standardize data collection between programs and allow for analysis of the bene ts and impact of FETP-Frontline on a global, as well as national and regional, scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, examination of direct impacts is a frequent omission in the evaluation of FETP and other related epidemiological workforce training programs, where the emphasis of evaluation is focused on pre-and post-training knowledge and competencies, participation in surveillance and response activities, and career progression of graduates. [16][17][18][19][20] To this end, a monitoring and evaluation toolkit could still have the exibility to be customized to t the speci c needs and context of each country, but would standardize data collection between programs and allow for analysis of the bene ts and impact of FETP-Frontline on a global, as well as national and regional, scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 14 Examples of interprofessional education include One Health and Field Epidemiology Training Programs. 53 …”
Section: External Environment Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%