2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2018.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field evaluation of a dual rapid Human Immunodeficiency Virus and treponemal syphilis rapid test in community-based clinics in Los Angeles and New York

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it would be of interest, to focus future research on the effect of the implementation of dual treponemal and non-treponemal POCTs on syphilis-related pregnancy outcomes, as well as testing and treatment rates [62]. Furthermore, studies implementing syphilis POCTs in established HIV screening programs did show promising results, suggesting a possible way to efficiently introduce syphilis POCT screening in low-resource settings [52,[54][55][56].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it would be of interest, to focus future research on the effect of the implementation of dual treponemal and non-treponemal POCTs on syphilis-related pregnancy outcomes, as well as testing and treatment rates [62]. Furthermore, studies implementing syphilis POCTs in established HIV screening programs did show promising results, suggesting a possible way to efficiently introduce syphilis POCT screening in low-resource settings [52,[54][55][56].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,18,34 Across numerous studies, study participants seeking regular screening for sexually transmitted infections, medical consultation, or a biological check-up, suspected of having a sexually transmitted infection, women seeking syndromic care, or sexually active women aged 14-49 years presenting with lower urinary tract infection symptoms were included. 20,22,24,25,[27][28][29][30][31]38 Many studies focused on key at-risk populations such as men who have sex with men, transgender populations, Aboriginal populations, people who inject drugs, women with at least two recent partners, female sex workers, and labourers who have paid for sex. 17,19,21,23,26,32,33,[35][36][37] Additional populations of interest included pregnant women, women who are infertile, and patients with genital ulcer disease (table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rapid multiplexed immunochromatographic tests complement the usage of RNAAT platform testing and Review might prove useful to fill timely access and screening gaps for simulatenous testing as shown in many studies [32][33][34][35][36][37][38]41 done in diverse outpatient clinics or mobile units at or near the point of care. These tests are generally best suited for application in remote or low-resource areas at or near the point of care, although screening can also be done by rapid sample collection in the field followed by sample testing with an RNAAT platform at a centralised facility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations