1982
DOI: 10.4039/ent1141121-12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field Evaluation of Blacklight and Sex Attractant Traps for Monitoring Seasonal Distribution of the Darksided Cutworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Ontario

Abstract: Field tests were conducted annually near Delhi, Ontario from 1977 to 1981 to evaluate blacklight and sex attractant traps for monitoring adult populations of the darksided cutworm, Euxoa messoria (Harris), in the major tobacco-producing area. There were no significant differences between the catches of sex attractant traps set at 1.0 m and 0.5 m above ground level. Sex attractant traps were superior to blacklight traps for monitoring populations of this pest species. There was a variation in abundance from yea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ayre et al (1982b) found the attractant for redbacked cutworm to be also >99% specific and the attractant for darksided cutworm to be >98% specific in 2 of 3 years; the lower specificity of 86% in the third year was due to capture of clover cutworm moths (13.5%) when the population of this nontarget species was very high (Ayre et al 1982b). Cheng and Struble (1982) reported that over a 5-year period in southern Ontario the specificity of the attractant for darksided cutworm averaged 88.6%, ranging from 70.2 to 94.3%, with the nontarget species Pseudaletia unipuncta (Haw.) and clover cutworm comprising 6.2 and 2.6% of the catch.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ayre et al (1982b) found the attractant for redbacked cutworm to be also >99% specific and the attractant for darksided cutworm to be >98% specific in 2 of 3 years; the lower specificity of 86% in the third year was due to capture of clover cutworm moths (13.5%) when the population of this nontarget species was very high (Ayre et al 1982b). Cheng and Struble (1982) reported that over a 5-year period in southern Ontario the specificity of the attractant for darksided cutworm averaged 88.6%, ranging from 70.2 to 94.3%, with the nontarget species Pseudaletia unipuncta (Haw.) and clover cutworm comprising 6.2 and 2.6% of the catch.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if the concentration approaches 1.0%, the blend becomes attractive to clover cutworm. The darksided cutworm attractant used by Ayre et al (1982b) and Cheng and Struble (1982) may have contained enough Z11-16:OH to be slightly attractive to clover cutworm. The attractants for variegated cutworm and bertha armyworm were less specific than those for the species considered above, averaging 72.6 and 59.7%, over 5 years (Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%