2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09566
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field evaluation of slow-release nitrogen fertilizers and real-time nitrogen management tools to improve grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of spring maize in Nepal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…UBN-150 increased PFPN by 8% and 21% and AEN by 22% and 27% over conventional urea applied at same rate (N-150) and the recommended N practice (N-200) (Figure 5). In accordance with this, previous studies have reported significant benefits of UB with deep placement in increasing NUE [13,38] and reducing N losses to the environment [6,20].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…UBN-150 increased PFPN by 8% and 21% and AEN by 22% and 27% over conventional urea applied at same rate (N-150) and the recommended N practice (N-200) (Figure 5). In accordance with this, previous studies have reported significant benefits of UB with deep placement in increasing NUE [13,38] and reducing N losses to the environment [6,20].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In this study, it was observed that the application of Zn-coated slow-release urea significantly increased the fresh mass of wheat plants ( Table 4 ). This higher biomass production could be due to the more efficient uptake of N from the coated urea because the N is released slowly according to the plant's needs from the coated urea, which reduced the losses and increase the plant growth [ 76 , 77 ]. The increase in biomass due to higher N uptake is because most of the proportion of the assimilated N by plants is allocated to the photosynthetic apparatus, which results in increased photosynthetic activity and ultimately higher biomass production [ 78 , 79 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tofa et al [ 32 ] stated that increased N application resulted in increased grain yield of maize, which doubled under 60 kg N kg −1 and tripled under 120 kg N ha −1 compared to the control. Additionally, Gautam et al [ 33 ] reported maize grain yield treated with 180 kg N ha −1 doubled compared to untreated maize (3 tons ha −1 to –6 tons ha −1 ). The opposite trend was observed for Arjuna, Anoman, Srikandi Putih, Manding, Lokal Poso, NK 6172, Pertiwi 3, and NK 33, which showed a significant decrease in grain yield under N-high than that of N-sufficient by 5%–100%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%