1970
DOI: 10.1002/pssa.19700010317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field evaporation rates of tungsten

Abstract: Essential parameters of the theory of field evaporation are the higher ionization potentials of the metal 2 I,, the surface atom's distance zo from the effective electronic surface plane of the metal, the polarizability a of the surface atom in its site, the energy difference A , between the atomic and the ionic states of the surface atom, the rate and temperature dependent activation energy Q,, and the pre-exponential factor G of the Arrhenius equation.It is shown how these data can be obtained from field eva… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

1971
1971
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The ionic model upon which these theories are based treats the temperature dependence of the evaporation field to be exclusively from the heat of sublimation, which, from Kirchhoff 's equation, displays very little temperature dependence from absolute zero to the melting point of metals~Zemansky, 1957!. Brandon predicted an increase in the rate of evaporation with increasing temperature-predictions that were validated ex-perimentally~Brandon, 1966a; Southon, 1968;Tsong & Müller, 1970;Ernst, 1979;Kellogg, 1981aKellogg, , 1982Wada, 1984;Miller & Smith, 1989!. While no fully satisfactory theoretical treatment of field evaporation is currently available~Miller & Smith, 1989;Tsong, 1990!, modification of the image hump theory of field evaporation led to an expression for the temperature sensitivity of the evaporation field at constant evaporation rate~Brandon, 1964rate~Brandon, , 1965rate~Brandon, , 1966a!.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ionic model upon which these theories are based treats the temperature dependence of the evaporation field to be exclusively from the heat of sublimation, which, from Kirchhoff 's equation, displays very little temperature dependence from absolute zero to the melting point of metals~Zemansky, 1957!. Brandon predicted an increase in the rate of evaporation with increasing temperature-predictions that were validated ex-perimentally~Brandon, 1966a; Southon, 1968;Tsong & Müller, 1970;Ernst, 1979;Kellogg, 1981aKellogg, , 1982Wada, 1984;Miller & Smith, 1989!. While no fully satisfactory theoretical treatment of field evaporation is currently available~Miller & Smith, 1989;Tsong, 1990!, modification of the image hump theory of field evaporation led to an expression for the temperature sensitivity of the evaporation field at constant evaporation rate~Brandon, 1964rate~Brandon, , 1965rate~Brandon, , 1966a!.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…xi est donc pratiquement nul. L'explication donnée par Tsong et Mueller [8] est que les atomes sont évaporés à partir de sites en coin, la surface étant schématisée sur la figure 4a. Pour x; = ro rayon atomique, la surface aurait la position indiquée sur la figure 4b ce qui est effectivement moins vraisemblable.…”
unclassified
“…8 represents the experimental field dependence of the field evaporation rate at 78 K [23]. At a geometrical field of 65 V/nm, F g ÀF a ¼ 3.1 V/nm, i.e.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%