2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2015.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field evidence of reproduction impairment through sperm DNA damage in the fish nase (Chondrostoma nasus) in anthropized hydrosystems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such impairments appear to be mediated by genetic or epigenetic changes to DNA in the sperm nucleus . For example, DNA damage in sperm positively correlated with offspring mortality or abnormality rates in other fishes . In addition, environmental condition and larval nutrition may also impact phenotypic plasticity and ontogeny of the skeleton .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such impairments appear to be mediated by genetic or epigenetic changes to DNA in the sperm nucleus . For example, DNA damage in sperm positively correlated with offspring mortality or abnormality rates in other fishes . In addition, environmental condition and larval nutrition may also impact phenotypic plasticity and ontogeny of the skeleton .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…70,71 For example, DNA damage in sperm positively correlated with offspring mortality or abnormality rates in other fishes. 72,73 In addition, environmental condition and larval nutrition may also impact phenotypic plasticity and ontogeny of the skeleton. 74 Notochord abnormalities are frequently observed in newly hatched larval.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown that genotoxicity might be correlated with other relevant ecotoxicological responses such as as impairment of reproduction and growth in fish. Those defects are relevant in ecotoxicology since they provide information to relate individual effects to possible changes in population size or structure[32]. Even if one should notice in this work that the genotoxicity potential of effluents was rather low, whatever the treatment, adding genotoxicity assessment within a FELS test seems undoubtedly an added value, without the need for extra experimental facilities[33].…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Our investigation focuses on spermatozoa since they are in most cases considered to be sensitive to contamination due to their inability to prevent oxidative stress and to repair DNA damage (Aitken et al, 2004). In addition, assessment of genotoxicity on this cellular type is of obvious interest regarding its key role in reproduction success (Lacaze et al, 2011a;Lewis and Galloway, 2010;Devaux et al 2011Devaux et al , 2015Santos et al, 2013a,b). During previous studies, the methodological procedure of Comet assay was adapted and optimized for Palaemon sp spermatozoa and a reference data distribution was defined for the coastal species P. serratus (Erraud et al, 2018 a,b).…”
Section: Mmentioning
confidence: 99%